Literature DB >> 24725867

Headspace-gas chromatographic fingerprints to discriminate and classify counterfeit medicines.

D Custers1, M Canfyn2, P Courselle2, J O De Beer2, S Apers3, E Deconinck4.   

Abstract

Counterfeit medicines are a global threat to public health. These pharmaceuticals are not subjected to quality control and therefore their safety, quality and efficacy cannot be guaranteed. Today, the safety evaluation of counterfeit medicines is mainly based on the identification and quantification of the active substances present. However, the analysis of potential toxic secondary components, like residual solvents, becomes more important. Assessment of residual solvent content and chemometric analysis of fingerprints might be useful in the discrimination between genuine and counterfeit pharmaceuticals. Moreover, the fingerprint approach might also contribute in the evaluation of the health risks different types of counterfeit medicines pose. In this study a number of genuine and counterfeit Viagra(®) and Cialis(®) samples were analyzed for residual solvent content using headspace-GC-MS. The obtained chromatograms were used as fingerprints and analyzed using different chemometric techniques: Principal Component Analysis, Projection Pursuit, Classification and Regression Trees and Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy. It was tested whether these techniques can distinguish genuine pharmaceuticals from counterfeit ones and if distinct types of counterfeits could be differentiated based on health risks. This chemometric analysis showed that for both data sets PCA clearly discriminated between genuine and counterfeit drugs, and SIMCA generated the best predictive models. This technique not only resulted in a 100% correct classification rate for the discrimination between genuine and counterfeit medicines, the classification of the counterfeit samples was also superior compared to CART. This study shows that chemometric analysis of headspace-GC impurity fingerprints allows to distinguish between genuine and counterfeit medicines and to differentiate between groups of counterfeit products based on the public health risks they pose.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemometrics; Counterfeit medicines; Fingerprints; Residual solvents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725867     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  5 in total

1.  Holistic Evaluation of Quality Consistency of Ixeris sonchifolia (Bunge) Hance Injectables by Quantitative Fingerprinting in Combination with Antioxidant Activity and Chemometric Methods.

Authors:  Lanping Yang; Guoxiang Sun; Yong Guo; Zhifei Hou; Shuai Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Fast Determination of Ingredients in Solid Pharmaceuticals by Microwave-Enhanced In-Source Decay of Microwave Plasma Torch Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Rui Su; Xinchen Wang; Changming Hou; Meiling Yang; Keke Huang; Huanwen Chen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Quantitative screening of the pharmaceutical ingredient for the rapid identification of substandard and falsified medicines using reflectance infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Graham Lawson; John Ogwu; Sangeeta Tanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Facing Counterfeit Medications in Sexual Medicine. A Systematic Scoping Review on Social Strategies and Technological Solutions.

Authors:  Andrea Sansone; Béatrice Cuzin; Emmanuele A Jannini
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.491

5.  Counterfeit medicines in Peru: a retrospective review (1997-2014).

Authors:  Edwin Medina; Elvira Bel; Josep María Suñé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.