Literature DB >> 24725838

Hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve operations.

Orlando Santana1, Andrés M Pineda2, Mery Cortes-Bergoderi3, Christos G Mihos2, Nirat Beohar2, Gervasio A Lamas2, Joseph Lamelas4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients requiring coronary revascularization and valve operations may benefit from a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by a minimally invasive valve operation, rather than the standard combined median sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and a valve operation. This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of this approach in a heterogeneous group of patients with concomitant coronary artery and valvular disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 222 consecutive patients with coronary artery and valvular heart disease who underwent PCI followed by elective minimally invasive valve operations at our institution between February 2009 and August 2013.
RESULTS: A total of 136 men and 86 women were identified. The mean age was 74.6 ± 8.2 years, with 181 (81.5%) undergoing 1-vessel, 27 (12.2%) undergoing 2-vessel, and 14 (6.3%) undergoing 3-vessel PCI. Within a median of 38 days (interquartile range [IQR] 18-65 days), 182 (82%) patients underwent primary and 34 (15.3%) underwent repeated valve operations, which consisted of 185 (83.3%) single-valve and 37 (16.7%) double-valve procedures. Operative mortality occurred in 8 patients (3.6%). At a mean follow-up of 16.2 ± 12 months, 6 patients required PCI, with target-vessel revascularization performed in 4 patients (2.1%). Survival at 1 and 4.5 years was 91.9% and 88.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In a heterogeneous group of patients, a hybrid approach of PCI followed by minimally invasive valve operations in patients undergoing primary or repeated valve operations can be performed with excellent outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725838     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Staged percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus combined coronary artery bypass graft and mitral valve surgery for two-vessel coronary artery disease and moderate to severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Andrés M Pineda; Evin Yucel; Hector Davila; Nirat Beohar; Orlando Santana
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 5-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Maurice Mawad; Todd B Heimowitz; Andrés M Pineda; Howard S Goldman; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery compared with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery in patients with prior cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Jason C Wigley; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Gerald P Rosen; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.