Literature DB >> 24725810

Perioperative outcomes of 6042 nephrectomies in 2012: surgeon-reported results in the UK from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) nephrectomy database.

John M Henderson1, Sarah Fowler, Adrian Joyce, Andrew Dickinson, Francis X Keeley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the perioperative outcomes from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) nephrectomy dataset for 2012, the first year of public reporting of individual surgeon outcomes in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All nephrectomies performed in the year 2012 and recorded in the database were analysed. These were divided into simple nephrectomy (SN), partial nephrectomy (PN), radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephroureterectomy (NU). The estimated capture rate for nephrectomy was 80%. The outcomes measured were 30-day mortality (30-DM), Clavien-Dindo complications grade ≥III, blood transfusion, conversion to open, and length of stay.
RESULTS: The overall 30-DM was 0.55% (SN 0.53%; PN 0.10%; RN 0.52%; NU 1.27%). Clavien-Dindo complications grade ≥III were recorded in 3.9% of nephrectomies (SN 4.3%; PN 5.4%; RN 3.1%; NU 4.5%). Blood transfusion was required during surgical admission for 8.4% of nephrectomies (SN 5.2%; PN 3.4%; RN 11.1%; NU 8.3%). Conversion to open was carried out in 5.5% of minimally invasive nephrectomies (SN 6.1%; PN 4.0%; RN 5.5%; NU 5.6%). Open nephrectomy patients remained in hospital for a median of 6 days (SN 7; PN 5; RN 7; NU 8 days), which was higher than the median 4-day stay (SN 3; PN 4; RN 4; NU 5 days) for minimally invasive surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy in 2012 was a safe procedure with morbidity and mortality rates comparable with or less than published series. The collection of surgeon-specific data should be iterative with further refinement of data categories, support for the collection process and independent validation of results.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; mortality; nephrectomy; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725810     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

1.  Patient and disease factors predictive of adverse perioperative outcomes after nephrectomy.

Authors:  J M Henderson; D Pitcher; R Steenkamp; S Fowler; F X Keeley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Ethical Issues in the Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Kidney Cancer J       Date:  2015

Review 3.  National nephrectomy registries: Reviewing the need for population-based data.

Authors:  John Pearson; Timothy Williamson; Joseph Ischia; Damien M Bolton; Mark Frydenberg; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-07

4.  Preoperative hypoalbuminemia and anemia as predictors of transfusion in radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kyungmi Kim; Hyungseok Seo; Ji-Hyun Chin; Hyo-Jung Son; Jai-Hyun Hwang; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  The Preoperative Assessment and Optimization of Patients Undergoing Major Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Benjamin W Turney; John Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Does indication matter?

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani; Santosh Kumar; J Chandrasingh; Antony Devasia; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

7.  Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Vincent Schwarze; Constantin Marschner; Moritz L Schnitzer; Matthias F Froelich; Johannes Rübenthaler; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcome data: how should surgeon's performance be reported? A retrospective learning curve analysis of two surgeons.

Authors:  Sarah Mason; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Ashish Chandra; Christian Brown; Declan Cahill
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-07-06

9.  Time trends in service provision and survival outcomes for patients with renal cancer treated by nephrectomy in England 2000-2010.

Authors:  Ray C J Hsu; Matthew Barclay; Molly A Loughran; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; James N Armitage
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Patients with Previous Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed O Breish; Danielle Whiting; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.