Literature DB >> 24725492

Screening and detection advances in magnetic resonance image-guided prostate biopsy.

Samuel K Stephenson1, Edward K Chang1, Leonard S Marks2.   

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has provided a method for visualizing prostate cancer. MRI-ultrasonography fusion allows prostate biopsy to be performed quickly, on an outpatient basis, using the transrectal technique. Targeted biopsies are more sensitive for detection of prostate cancer than nontargeted, systematic biopsies and detect more significant prostate cancers and fewer insignificant cancers than conventional biopsies. A negative MRI scan should not defer biopsy. Two groups who will especially benefit from targeted prostate biopsy are men with low-risk lesions in active surveillance and men with increased prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative conventional biopsies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Targeted prostate biopsy; Transrectal ultrasonography; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725492      PMCID: PMC3986723          DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  31 in total

1.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Irving Kaplan; Nicklas E Oldenburg; Paul Meskell; Michael Blake; Paul Church; Edward J Holupka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion.

Authors:  Boris A Hadaschik; Timur H Kuru; Corina Tulea; Philip Rieker; Ionel V Popeneciu; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Johannes Huber; Pawel Zogal; Dogu Teber; Sascha Pahernik; Matthias Roethke; Patrik Zamecnik; Wilfried Roth; Georgios Sakas; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Shyam Natarajan; Leonard S Marks; Daniel J A Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Maria Luz Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Henkjan J Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Office based transrectal saturation biopsy improves prostate cancer detection compared to extended biopsy in the repeat biopsy population.

Authors:  Osama M Zaytoun; Ayman S Moussa; Tianming Gao; Khaled Fareed; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Martijn G Schouten; Joyce G R Bomers; Stefan P Hoogendoorn; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Hambrock; Henk Vergunst; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

1.  Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Iqbal Sahibzada; Deepak Batura; Giles Hellawell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Use, Outcomes, Imaging, and Diagnostic Tools.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Overview of the technique, clinical applications in prostate biopsy and future directions.

Authors:  Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; John Warren Davis
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Sandeep S Arora; Kristen R Scarpato; Daniel Barocas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Guidance on patient consultation. Current evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in healthy men and treatment options for men with proven localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Justin Collins; Pirus Ghadjar; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  The role of MRI in active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michele Fascelli; Arvin K George; Thomas Frye; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Absolute Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening: Balance of Benefits and Harms by Center within the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Anssi Auvinen; Sue M Moss; Teuvo L J Tammela; Kimmo Taari; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Marco Zappa; Donella Puliti; Louis J Denis; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marco Randazzo; Alvaro Paez; Marcos Lujan; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study.

Authors:  Somendra Bansal; Narmada P Gupta; Rajiv Yadav; Rakesh Khera; Kulbir Ahlawat; Dheeraj Gautam; Rajesh Ahlawat; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

9.  Comparison of diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral CT and MRI for different pathological stages of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yanbin Sui; Jian Li; Zhenxing Zou; Yunxia Shi; Cuijuan Hao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Chen Yegang; Yang Yongjiao; Xu Yawei; Kang Jiaqi; Wang Xianhao; Song Yuxuan; Hu Rui; Zhang Wei; Ou Ningjing
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.