Literature DB >> 24725349

Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

G Cordasco1, G Matarese, L Rustico, S Fastuca, A Caprioglio, S J Lindauer, R Nucera.   

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the efficacy of protraction facemask on the correction of Class III malocclusion in the short term. A systematic review of articles was performed using different electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, LILACS, and Google Scholar). Search terms comprised 'orthopedic treatment' and 'Class III malocclusion'. The selection criteria were set in order to include in this review only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) performed treating with facemask Class III growing patients. Studies' selection, data extraction, and risk of bias's assessment were executed independently by two authors using pre-defined data forms. All pooled analyses of data were based on random effects models. A pre-specified subgroup analysis was planned to evaluate the effect of preliminary rapid palatal expansion on facemask efficacy. Three RCTs met our inclusion criteria. In total, data from 155 patients (92 treated and 63 controls) were collected. The treated group showed the following significant changes: ANB° +3.66° [95%CI (2.58, 4.74)]; SNA° +2.10 [95%CI (1.14, 3.06)]; SNB° -1.54 [95%CI (-2.13, -0.95)]; SN-palatal plane -0.82° [95%CI (-1.62, -0.02)]; and SN-mandibular plane +1.51 [95%CI (0.61, 2.41)]. Heterogeneity varied from low to moderate (mean I(2) value: 41.4 ± 20.8). Facemask is effective correcting Class III malocclusion in the short term. The skeletal modifications induced by facemask are forward displacement of maxilla, backward displacement of mandible, clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane, and counterclockwise rotation of the maxillary plane.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human study; malocclusion; meta-analysis; protraction facemask; review article

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725349     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  25 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: A predictor of maxillary protraction? Part I - A classification method.

Authors:  F Angelieri; L Franchi; L H S Cevidanes; C T Hino; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?

Authors:  Ute E M Schneider-Moser; Lorenz Moser
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 7.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Authors:  Apoorva Kamath; Shetty Suhani Sudhakar; Greeshma Kannan; Kripal Rai; Athul Sb
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

8.  Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angela Galeotti; Stefano Martina; Valeria Viarani; Lorenzo Franchi; Roberto Rongo; Vincenzo D'Antò; Paola Festa
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  When Do Skeletal Class III Patients Wear Their Reverse Pull Headgears?

Authors:  Nurhat Ozkalayci; Orhan Cicek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.