Literature DB >> 24724860

Year-round effects of climate on demographic parameters of an arctic-nesting goose species.

Louise van Oudenhove1,2, Gilles Gauthier1, Jean-Dominique Lebreton2.   

Abstract

Understanding how climate change will affect animal population dynamics remains a major challenge, especially in long-distant migrants exposed to different climatic regimes throughout their annual cycle. We evaluated the effect of temperature throughout the annual cycle on demographic parameters (age-specific survival and recruitment, breeding propensity and fecundity) of the greater snow goose (Chen caerulescens atlantica L.), an arctic-nesting species. As this is a hunted species, we used the theory of exploited populations to estimate hunting mortality separately from natural mortality in order to evaluate climatic effects only on the latter form of mortality. Our analysis was based on a 22-year marking study (n = 27,150 females) and included live recaptures at the breeding colony and dead recoveries from hunters. We tested the effect of climatic covariates by applying a procedure that accounts for unexplained environmental variation in the demographic parameter to a multistate capture-mark-recapture recruitment model. Breeding propensity, clutch size and hatching probability all increased with high temperatures on the breeding grounds. First-year survival to natural causes of mortality increased when temperature was high at the end of the summer, whereas adult survival was not affected by temperature. On the contrary, accession to reproduction decreased with warmer climatic conditions during the non-breeding season. Survival was strongly negatively related to hunting mortality in adults, as expected, but not in first-year birds, which suggests the possibility of compensation between natural and hunting mortality in the latter group. We show that events occurring both at and away from the breeding ground can affect the demography of migratory birds, either directly or through carryover effects, and sometimes in opposite ways. This highlights the need to account for the whole life cycle of an animal when attempting to project the response of populations to future climatic changes.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chen caerulescens atlantica; capture–mark–recapture; climate change; harvest; multistate model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24724860     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  Partitioning prediction uncertainty in climate-dependent population models.

Authors:  Gilles Gauthier; Guillaume Péron; Jean-Dominique Lebreton; Patrick Grenier; Louise van Oudenhove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Survival and local recruitment are driven by environmental carry-over effects from the wintering area in a migratory seabird.

Authors:  K Lesley Szostek; Peter H Becker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The greater snow goose Anser caerulescens atlanticus: Managing an overabundant population.

Authors:  Josée Lefebvre; Gilles Gauthier; Jean-François Giroux; Austin Reed; Eric T Reed; Luc Bélanger
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Can temporal covariation and autocorrelation in demographic rates affect population dynamics in a raptor species?

Authors:  Rémi Fay; Stephanie Michler; Jacques Laesser; Jacques Jeanmonod; Michael Schaub
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic-breeding seabird.

Authors:  Rolanda J Steenweg; Glenn T Crossin; Holly L Hennin; H Grant Gilchrist; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Climatic patterns in the establishment of wintering areas by North American migratory birds.

Authors:  Heidi Pérez-Moreno; Enrique Martínez-Meyer; Jorge Soberón Mainero; Octavio Rojas-Soto
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Earlier breeding, lower success: does the spatial scale of climatic conditions matter in a migratory passerine bird?

Authors:  Annegret Grimm; Brigitte M Weiß; Lars Kulik; Jean-Baptiste Mihoub; Roger Mundry; Ulrich Köppen; Tomas Brueckmann; Ruth Thomsen; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Climate warming may affect the optimal timing of reproduction for migratory geese differently in the low and high Arctic.

Authors:  Thomas K Lameris; Margje E de Jong; Michiel P Boom; Henk P van der Jeugd; Konstantin E Litvin; Maarten J J E Loonen; Bart A Nolet; Jouke Prop
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.