Literature DB >> 24724857

Comparative inpatient resource utilization for patients undergoing endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions.

Andrew S Little1, Kristina Chapple, Heidi Jahnke, William L White.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECT.: An increasingly important measure in the health care field is utilization of hospital resources, particularly in the context of emerging surgical techniques. Despite the recent widespread adoption of the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for pituitary lesion surgery, the health care resources utilized with this approach have not been compared with those utilized with the traditional microscopic approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the drivers of resource utilization by comparing hospital charges for patients with pituitary tumors who had undergone either endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery.
METHODS: A complete accounting of all hospital charges for 166 patients prospectively enrolled in a surgical quality-of-life study at a single pituitary center during October 2011-June 2013 was undertaken. Patients were assigned to surgical technique group according to surgeon preference and then managed according to a standard postoperative institutional set of orders. Individual line-item charges were assigned to categories (such as pharmacy, imaging, surgical, laboratory, room, pathology, and recovery unit), and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: Of the 166 patients, 99 underwent microscopic surgery and 67 underwent endoscopic surgery. Baseline demographic descriptors and tumor characteristics did not differ significantly. Mean total hospital charges were $74,703 ± $15,142 and $72,311 ± $16,576 for microscopic and endoscopic surgery patients, respectively (p = 0.33). Furthermore, other than for pathology, charge categories did not differ significantly between groups. A 2-step multivariate regression model revealed that length of stay was the most influential variable, followed by a diagnosis of Cushing's disease, and then by endoscopic surgical technique. The model accounts for 42% of the variance in hospital charges.
CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that adoption of the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary lesions does not adversely affect utilization of resources for inpatients. The primary drivers of hospital charges, in order of importance, were length of stay, a diagnosis of Cushing's disease, and, to a lesser extent, use of the endoscopic technique. This study also highlights the influence of individual surgeon practice patterns on resource utilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic surgery; hospital charges; pituitary surgery; resource utilization; transsphenoidal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24724857     DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS132095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Pituitary Adenoma: Case Series, Review of the Literature, and a Skull Base Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Avital Perry; Christopher Salvatore Graffeo; Christopher Marcellino; Bruce E Pollock; Nicholas M Wetjen; Fredric B Meyer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 2.  Resection of pituitary tumors: endoscopic versus microscopic.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Walid I Essayed; Aaron Cohen-Gadol; Gabriel Zada; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  OUTCOME OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM APPROACH TO THE CARE OF PATIENTS AFTER TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY.

Authors:  Arthur S Carminucci; John C Ausiello; Gabrielle Page-Wilson; Michelle Lee; Laura Good; Jeffrey N Bruce; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Surgical treatment of prolactinomas: cons.

Authors:  Eve Bloomgarden; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Transient Exacerbation of Nasal Symptoms following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Benjamin M Davies; Erica Tirr; Yi Yuen Wang; Kanna K Gnanalingham
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-01-23

6.  Pilot Study on Early Postoperative Discharge in Pituitary Adenoma Patients: Effect of Socioeconomic Factors and Benefit of Specialized Pituitary Centers.

Authors:  Christopher A Sarkiss; James Lee; Joseph A Papin; Eliza B Geer; Rudrani Banik; Janet C Rucker; Barbara Oudheusden; Satish Govindaraj; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-04-27

7.  Comparative Cost Analysis of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Chikezie Ikechukwu Eseonu; Karim ReFaey; Oscar Garcia; Roberto Salvatori; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 8.  Recent Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishioka
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Endoscopic vs. Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for the Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Hongyan Liu; Siliang Man; Geng Liu; Quan Li; Qingyao Zuo; Lili Huo; Wei Li; Wei Deng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-02

10.  Costs and Its Determinants in Pituitary Tumour Surgery.

Authors:  Alies J Dekkers; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Emmy M van der Hoeven; Marco J T Verstegen; Alberto M Pereira; Wouter R van Furth; Nienke R Biermasz
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.055

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.