Literature DB >> 24724724

Fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing is more sensitive than phrenic nerve stimulation for detection of right phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Markus Linhart1, Annika Nielson1, René P Andrié1, Erica L Mittmann-Braun1, Florian Stöckigt1, Jens Kreuz1, Georg Nickenig1, Jan W Schrickel1, Lars M Lickfett1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Right phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) is a typical complication of cryoballoon ablation of the right-sided pulmonary veins (PVs). Phrenic nerve function can be monitored by palpating the abdomen during phrenic nerve pacing from the superior vena cava (SVC pacing) or by fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing. We sought to compare the sensitivity of these 2 techniques during cryoballoon ablation for detection of PNP. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 133 patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation were monitored with both SVC pacing and fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing during ablation of the right superior PV. PNP occurred in 27/133 patients (20.0%). Most patients (89%) had spontaneous recovery of phrenic nerve function at the end of the procedure or on the following day. Three patients were discharged with persistent PNP. All PNP were detected first by fluoroscopic observation of diaphragm movement during spontaneous breathing, while diaphragm could still be stimulated by SVC pacing. In patients with no recovery until discharge, PNP occurred at a significantly earlier time (86 ± 34 seconds vs. 296 ± 159 seconds, P < 0.001). No recovery occurred in 2/4 patients who were ablated with a 23 mm cryoballoon as opposed to 1/23 patients with a 28 mm cryoballoon (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic assessment of diaphragm movement during spontaneous breathing is more sensitive for detection PNP as compared to SVC pacing. PNP as assessed by fluoroscopy is frequent (20.0%) and carries a high rate of recovery (89%) until discharge. Early onset of PNP and use of 23 mm cryoballoon are associated with PNP persisting beyond hospital discharge.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; cryoballoon ablation; phrenic nerve injury; phrenic nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24724724     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  3 in total

1.  Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava by laser balloon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Martín R Arceluz; Pedro F Cruz; Estela Falconi; Rosa Montes de Oca; Reina Delgado; Jorge Figueroa; Marta Ortega; José L Merino
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Kazuo Usuda; Shuhei Fujita; Michiro Maruyama; Kan-Ichi Otowa; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Outcome of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Medium-term follow-up from a single center.

Authors:  J Liu; J Kaufmann; C Kriatselis; E Fleck; J Gerds-Li
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 1.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.