Literature DB >> 24724286

Behavioral differences among four co-occurring species of container mosquito larvae: effects of depth and resource environments.

J J Skiff, D A Yee.   

Abstract

Mosquito larvae often exhibit different behaviors depending on the aspects of the aquatic environment, including the presence of different physical factors and detrital food sources. Regardless of these physical differences, different genera also devote different amounts of time to different behaviors. To determine if differences existed among four focal mosquito species (Aedes albopictus (Singh), Aedes triseriatus (Say), Culex quinquefasciatus (Say), Culex coronator Dyar & Knab), we recorded behaviors under different food environments (animal detritus, leaf detritus, and inoculum + inert material) and depths (shallow and deep). Based on past work, we predicted that larval mosquitoes in the genus Culex would spend more time filtering or resting at the surface of containers, whereas Aedes mosquitoes would spend more time browsing on surfaces. Behaviors were recorded for 30 min and were used to generate instantaneous scan census of behavior (thrashing, browsing, and resting or filtering) and locations (top, middle, bottom, wall, and detritus) of each larva every minute. There were significant differences in behaviors among the three detritus types and the four species (Culex generally different than Aedes), as well as a significant interaction between depth and detritus type. Consistent with predictions, Culex species spent more time filtering or resting, whereas Aedes larvae spent more time browsing on detritus. However, all four species changed their behavior similarly among the different environments, and Cx. coronator exhibited some similar behaviors as the two Aedes species. These behavioral differences may aid in explaining performance differences between different species and outcomes of interspecific encounters, which in turn can affect adult emergence and patterns of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24724286      PMCID: PMC4011075          DOI: 10.1603/me13159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  29 in total

1.  Container surface area and water depth influence the population dynamics of the mosquito Culex pervigilans (Diptera: Culicidae) and its associated predators in New Zealand.

Authors:  Philip J Lester; Adrian J Pike
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Constitutive differences between natural and artificial container mosquito habitats: vector communities, resources, microorganisms, and habitat parameters.

Authors:  D A Yee; D Allgood; J M Kneitel; K A Kuehn
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  First record of Culex coronator from Alabama.

Authors:  James R McNelly; Matthew Smith; Kelly M Micher-Stevens; Bruce A Harrison
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Distribution expansion of Culex coronator in Alabama.

Authors:  Katherine M Gray; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena; Micky D Eubanks
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Culex coronator in coastal Georgia and South Carolina.

Authors:  Robert A Moulis; Jennifer D Russell; Henry B Lewandowski; Pamela S Thompson; Jeffrey L Heusel
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Relationship between filtering activity and ingestion of solids by larvae of the mosquito Culex pipiens: a method for assessing phagostimulant factors.

Authors:  R H Dadd
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  First record of Culex (Culex) coronator in Louisiana, USA.

Authors:  Mustapha Debboun; Dennis D Kuhr; Leopoldo M Rueda; James E Pecor
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Water management for controlling the breeding of Anopheles mosquitoes in rice irrigation schemes in Kenya.

Authors:  C M Mutero; H Blank; F Konradsen; W van der Hoek
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 3.112

9.  Differential Behavioral Responses to Water-Borne Cues to Predation in Two Container-Dwelling Mosquitoes.

Authors:  B Kesavaraju; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  Consequences of detritus type in an aquatic microsystem: effects on water quality, micro-organisms and performance of the dominant consumer.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Freshw Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.809

View more
  9 in total

1.  Mosquito Larvae in Tires from Mississippi, United States: The Efficacy of Abiotic and Biotic Parameters in Predicting Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Mosquito Populations and Communities.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Alisa A Abuzeineh; Nnaemeka F Ezeakacha; Stephanie S Schelble; William C Glasgow; Stephen D Flanagan; Jeffrey J Skiff; Ashton Reeves; Kevin Kuehn
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Distinct navigation behaviors in Aedes, Anopheles and Culex mosquito larvae.

Authors:  Eleanor K Lutz; Kim T Ha; Jeffrey A Riffell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Contributions of temporal segregation, oviposition choice, and non-additive effects of competitors to invasion success of Aedes japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in North America.

Authors:  Ebony G Murrell; Bruce H Noden; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Prior Hydrologic Disturbance Affects Competition between Aedes Mosquitoes via Changes in Leaf Litter.

Authors:  Cassandra D Smith; T Zachary Freed; Paul T Leisnham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Competition among Aedes aegypti larvae.

Authors:  Kurt Steinwascher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computational and experimental insights into the chemosensory navigation of Aedes aegypti mosquito larvae.

Authors:  Eleanor K Lutz; Tjinder S Grewal; Jeffrey A Riffell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Development of an Alternative Low-Cost Larval Diet for Mass Rearing of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes.

Authors:  Umesha Senevirathna; Lahiru Udayanga; G A S M Ganehiarachchi; Menaka Hapugoda; Tharaka Ranathunge; Nilmini Silva Gunawardene
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Imaging and spectral analysis of autofluorescence patterns in larval head structures of mosquito vectors.

Authors:  Francesca Scolari; Alessandro Girella; Anna Cleta Croce
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 1.966

9.  How Diverse Detrital Environments Influence Nutrient Stoichiometry between Males and Females of the Co-Occurring Container Mosquitoes Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti, and Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Michael G Kaufman; Nnaemeka F Ezeakacha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.