| Literature DB >> 24724040 |
Yi Song1, Sung Woo Jeong1, Won Sup Lee2, Semin Park1, Yun-Hi Kim1, Gon-Sup Kim3, Soo Jung Lee4, Jong Sung Jin5, Chi-Yeon Kim6, Ji Eun Lee1, Se Yun Ok1, Ki-Min Bark7, Sung Chul Shin1.
Abstract
The Korean prostrate spurge Euphorbia supina is a weed that has been used in folk medicine in Korea against a variety of diseases. Nine polyphenols were characterized for this plant by using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and the results were compared with the literature data. The individual components were validated using the calibration curves of structurally related external standards and quantified for the first time by using the validated method. Correlation coefficients (r (2)) were >0.9907. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the method were >0.028 mg/L and 0.094 mg/L, respectively. Recoveries measured at 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L were 76.1-102.8% and 85.2-98.6%, respectively. The total amount of the identified polyphenols was 3352.9 ± 2.8 mg/kg fresh plant. Quercetin and kaempferol derivatives formed 84.8% of the total polyphenols. The antioxidant activities of the flavonoids were evaluated in terms of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation-scavenging activity, and the reducing power showed a dose-dependent increase. Cell viability was effectively suppressed at polyphenol mixture concentrations >250 mg/L.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24724040 PMCID: PMC3958725 DOI: 10.1155/2014/418690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Chromatograms of the Euphorbia supina polyphenol mixture obtained using high-performance liquid chromatography:1, gallic acid; 2, protocatechuic acid; 3, nodakenin; 4, quercetin 3-O-hexoside; 5, quercetin 3-O-pentoside; 6, kaempferol 3-O-hexoside; 7, kaempferol 3-O-pentoside; 8, quercetin; 9, kaempferol. Detection wavelength: 254 nm.
Figure 2Structures of the eight polyphenols and one nodakenin in Euphorbia supina.
Mass spectral data of the Euphorbia supina polyphenol mixture.
| Compounds | [M − H]−/[M + H]+ | MS/MS | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid ( | 169 | 169, 125, 97 | [ |
| Protocatechuic acid ( | 153 | 153, 109, 108 | [ |
| Nodakenin ( | /409 | 409, 391, 353, 389, 247, 229, 203, 185 | [ |
| Quercetin 3- | 463 | 463, 301, 300, 283, 271, 255, 151 | [ |
| Quercetin 3- | 433 | 433, 300, 273, 271, 255, 179, 151 | [ |
| Kaempferol 3- | 447 | 447, 285, 255 | [ |
| Kaempferol 3- | /419 | 419, 309, 287, 155 | [ |
| Quercetin ( | /301 | 301, 273, 179, 153 | [ |
| Kaempferol ( | /287 | 287, 258, 165, 153, 121 | [ |
Regression data, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ) for the five external standards.
| Standard | Calibration curve |
| LOD | LOQ | Recovery (%) ± RSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/L) | (mg/L) | 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | |||
| Gallic acid |
| 0.9993 | 0.032 | 0.107 | 79.6 ± 6.1 | 85.2 ± 0.5 |
| Protocatechuic acid |
| 0.9982 | 0.030 | 0.102 | 88.5 ± 0.2 | 87.8 ± 0.5 |
| 7-Hydroxycoumarin |
| 0.9955 | 0.142 | 0.473 | 102.8 ± 0.7 | 98.6 ± 11.6 |
| Quercetin 3- |
| 0.9949 | 0.037 | 0.125 | 76.1 ± 0.1 | 90.9 ± 14.0 |
| Kaempferol |
| 0.9907 | 0.028 | 0.094 | 100.0 ± 3.0 | 97.4 ± 1.4 |
y: peak area of standard; x: concentration of standard (mg/L).
Concentration of polyphenols in Euphorbia supina (mg/kg fresh plant).
| Compounds | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Gallic acid ( | 264.4 ± 0.7 |
| Protocatechuic acid ( | 124.3 ± 0.3 |
| Nodakenin ( | 120.0 ± 4.7 |
| Quercetin 3- | 458.3 ± 4.9 |
| Quercetin 3- | 1648.2 ± 20.2 |
| Kaempferol 3- | 553.8 ± 4.2 |
| Kaempferol 3- | 126.9 ± 1.5 |
| Quercetin ( | 118.7 ± 1.0 |
| Kaempferol ( | 21.0 ± 4.6 |
|
| |
| Total | 3352.9 ± 2.8 |
Antioxidant activity (%).
| Concentration, mg/L | Scavenging activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 500 | ||
| DPPH | 29.85 ± 0.86a | 31.75 ± 1.41a | 40.88 ± 1.15b | 47.63 ± 1.93c | 71.44 ± 1.04d | 229.19 ± 22.34A |
| ABTS | 12.25 ± 0.67a | 19.76 ± 0.63b | 32.38 ± 0.46c | 53.83 ± 0.27d | 88.13 ± 0.73e | 180.94 ± 3.48A |
| RP | 0.091 ± 0.001a | 0.108 ± 0.002b | 0.132 ± 0.002c | 0.178 ± 0.001d | 0.328 ± 0.001e | 443.60 ± 4.01B |
Assay wavelength: 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) = 517 nm and 2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) = 414 nm, and reducing power (RP) = 700 nm.
Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) EC50; DPPH: 121.85 ± 0.39 mg/L; ABTS: 93.85 ± 0.43 mg/L; RP: 26.71 ± 0.69 mg/L.
Each value represents mean ± standard deviation (SD), n = 5.
a–eMeans with different superscripts in the row are significantly different at P < 0.05.
AEC50 (mg/L) values were calculated from the calibration curves using five different concentrations (25–500 mg/L) in quintuplicate and their data were presented as 50% scavenging activity.
BRP value (EC0.3) was reducing activity calculated from the calibration curves using five different concentrations (25–500 mg/L) in quintuplicate.
Figure 3Antiproliferation effect on Hep3B cells by the Euphorbia supina polyphenol mixture. Hep3B cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of the E. supina polyphenol mixture for 24 h and viability was determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates of independent experiments. The asterisk (∗) indicates a significant difference from the control group (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Morphological changes in Hep3B cells. Morphology of Hep3B cells visualized by optical microscopy (×100). The cells were treated with various concentrations of the Euphorbia supina polyphenol mixture for 24 h. (a) Control, (b) 31.25 mg/L, (c) 62.5 mg/L, (d) 125 mg/L, (e) 250 mg/L, and (f) 500 mg/L. White arrows indicate suspended cells.