| Literature DB >> 24723963 |
Danilo Maciel Carneiro1, Ramias Calixto Freire2, Tereza Cristina de Deus Honório3, Iury Zoghaib3, Fabiana Fernandes de S E Silva Cardoso4, Leonice Manrique F Tresvenzol3, José Realino de Paula3, Ana Luiza Lima Sousa5, Paulo César Brandão Veiga Jardim6, Luiz Carlos da Cunha3.
Abstract
In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 36 healthy male volunteers were randomly distributed into three groups (n = 12) that underwent a three-step treatment. For four consecutive days, we alternately administered a standardized dried extract of Equisetum arvense (EADE, 900 mg/day), placebo (corn starch, 900 mg/day), or hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/day), separated by a 10-day washout period. Each volunteer served as his own control, and the groups' results were compared. We repeated the same evaluation after each stage of treatment to evaluate the safety of the drug. The diuretic effect of EADE was assessed by monitoring the volunteers' water balance over a 24 h period. The E. arvense extract produced a diuretic effect that was stronger than that of the negative control and was equivalent to that of hydrochlorothiazide without causing significant changes in the elimination of electrolytes. There was no significant increase in the urinary elimination of catabolites. Rare minor adverse events were reported. The clinical examinations and laboratory tests showed no changes before or after the experiment, suggesting that the drug is safe for acute use. Further research is needed to better clarify the mechanism of diuretic action and the other possible pharmacological actions of this phytomedicine.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24723963 PMCID: PMC3960516 DOI: 10.1155/2014/760683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Drug administration sequences of study according to the proposed design by Williams.
| Stage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | |||
| Treatment: 4 days | 10 days | Treatment: 4 days | 10 days | Treatment: 4 days | |
| Seq. 1 ABC | A ( | Washout | B ( | Washout | C ( |
| Seq. 2 CAB | C ( | Washout | A ( | Washout | B ( |
| Seq. 3 BCA | B ( | Washout | C ( | Washout | A ( |
| Seq. 4 CBA | C ( | Washout | B ( | Washout | A ( |
| Seq. 5 BAC | B ( | Washout | A ( | Washout | C ( |
| Seq. 6 ACB | A ( | Washout | C ( | Washout | B ( |
Intragroup comparisons of fluid balance (n = 36/group). The values represent the means ± SD, and the significance was set at P < 0.05.
| Group | Fluid Balance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FB0 (mL) | FB (mL) | FFB (mL) |
| |
| A | 844.43 ± 632.72 | 522.62 ± 463.03 | −321.81 ± 481.02 | <0.001* |
| B | 773.86 ± 955.37 | 542.01 ± 935.37 | −231.84 ± 726.60 | 0.067 |
| C | 634.69 ± 511.46 | 763.21 ± 482.45 | 130.27 ± 534.30 | 0.164 |
Groups: A: Equisetum arvense; B: hydrochlorothiazide; C: placebo. FB0: initial fluid balance without treatment; FB: FB after treatment; FFB: final fluid balance (FB − FB0).
*P < 0.05.
Figure 1Comparisons of the fluid balance between groups (n = 36/group). Groups: A = Equisetum arvense; B = hydrochlorothiazide; C = placebo. A versus C (P < 0.001). B versus C (P = 0.026). A versus B (P = 0.056).