BACKGROUND: To investigate the frequency, predictors, and clinical impact of electrographic seizures in patients with high clinical or radiologic grade non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), independent of referral bias. METHODS: We compared rates of electrographic seizures and associated clinical variables and outcomes in patients with high clinical or radiologic grade non-traumatic SAH. Rates of electrographic seizure detection before and after institution of a guideline which made continuous EEG monitoring routine in this population were compared. RESULTS: Electrographic seizures occurred in 17.6 % of patients monitored expressly because of clinically suspected subclinical seizures. In unselected patients, seizures still occurred in 9.6 % of all cases, and in 8.6 % of cases in which there was no a priori suspicion of seizures. The first seizure detected occurred 5.4 (IQR 2.9-7.3) days after onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage with three of eight patients (37.5 %) having the first recorded seizure more than 48 h following EEG initiation, and 2/8 (25 %) at more than 72 h following EEG initiation. High clinical grade was associated with poor outcome at time of hospital discharge; electrographic seizures were not associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Electrographic seizures occur at a relatively high rate in patients with non-traumatic SAH even after accounting for referral bias. The prolonged time to the first detected seizure in this cohort may reflect dynamic clinical features unique to the SAH population.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the frequency, predictors, and clinical impact of electrographic seizures in patients with high clinical or radiologic grade non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), independent of referral bias. METHODS: We compared rates of electrographic seizures and associated clinical variables and outcomes in patients with high clinical or radiologic grade non-traumatic SAH. Rates of electrographic seizure detection before and after institution of a guideline which made continuous EEG monitoring routine in this population were compared. RESULTS: Electrographic seizures occurred in 17.6 % of patients monitored expressly because of clinically suspected subclinical seizures. In unselected patients, seizures still occurred in 9.6 % of all cases, and in 8.6 % of cases in which there was no a priori suspicion of seizures. The first seizure detected occurred 5.4 (IQR 2.9-7.3) days after onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage with three of eight patients (37.5 %) having the first recorded seizure more than 48 h following EEG initiation, and 2/8 (25 %) at more than 72 h following EEG initiation. High clinical grade was associated with poor outcome at time of hospital discharge; electrographic seizures were not associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Electrographic seizures occur at a relatively high rate in patients with non-traumatic SAH even after accounting for referral bias. The prolonged time to the first detected seizure in this cohort may reflect dynamic clinical features unique to the SAH population.
Authors: Daniel M S Raper; Robert M Starke; Ricardo J Komotar; Rodney Allan; E Sander Connolly Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Brian L Hoh; Mehmet A Topcuoglu; Aneesh B Singhal; Johnny C Pryor; James D Rabinov; Guy A Rordorf; Bob S Carter; Christopher S Ogilvy Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Dennis J Nieuwkamp; Larissa E Setz; Ale Algra; Francisca H H Linn; Nicolien K de Rooij; Gabriël J E Rinkel Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jan Claassen; Lawrence J Hirsch; Kurt T Kreiter; Evelyn Y Du; E Sander Connolly; Ronald G Emerson; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Eric S Rosenthal; Siddharth Biswal; Sahar F Zafar; Kathryn L O'Connor; Sophia Bechek; Apeksha V Shenoy; Emily J Boyle; Mouhsin M Shafi; Emily J Gilmore; Brandon P Foreman; Nicolas Gaspard; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Jonathan Rosand; Daniel B Hoch; Cenk Ayata; Sydney S Cash; Andrew J Cole; Aman B Patel; M Brandon Westover Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Daniel Kondziella; Christian K Friberg; Ian Wellwood; Clemens Reiffurth; Martin Fabricius; Jens P Dreier Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: David Panczykowski; Matthew Pease; Yin Zhao; Gregory Weiner; William Ares; Elizabeth Crago; Brian Jankowitz; Andrew F Ducruet Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J A Kim; E S Rosenthal; S Biswal; S Zafar; A V Shenoy; K L O'Connor; S C Bechek; J Valdery Moura; M M Shafi; A B Patel; S S Cash; M B Westover Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: W Taylor Kimberly; Eric S Rosenthal; India A Lissak; Sahar F Zafar; M Brandon Westover; Riana L Schleicher; Jennifer A Kim; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Christopher J Stapleton; Aman B Patel Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 7.914