Literature DB >> 24723416

Accelerated Versus Traditional Rehabilitation After Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Lateral Instability of the Ankle in Athletes.

Wataru Miyamoto1, Masato Takao2, Kazuaki Yamada2, Takashi Matsushita2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several reconstruction procedures for chronic lateral ankle instability using autografts have been reported, all have recommended postoperative immobilization and a nonweightbearing period. HYPOTHESIS: Reconstructive surgery with a gracilis autograft using an interference fit anchoring system for chronic lateral ankle instability enables early accelerated rehabilitation and recovery with a return to activity without requiring immobilization. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 33 patients (33 feet) who underwent reconstruction of the anterior talofibular ligament with a gracilis autograft using interference screws were included; 15 were followed for 4 weeks with postoperative cast immobilization (group I), while 18 were followed with accelerated rehabilitation without immobilization (group A). Clinical and radiological results were evaluated based on the Karlsson and Peterson score, talar tilt angle, anterior displacement of the talus on stress radiography, and time between surgery and return to full athletic activity.
RESULTS: The mean Karlsson and Peterson scores before and 2 years after surgery were the following: for group I: 62.3 ± 4.7 (range, 54-72) and 94.4 ± 7.1 (range, 76-100), respectively (P < .001), and for group A: 64.1 ± 4.8 (range, 57-70) and 91.7 ± 7.7 (range, 74-100), respectively (P < .001). The mean difference in the talar tilt angle compared with the contralateral side and mean displacement of the talus on stress radiography before and 2 years after surgery were the following: for group I: 8.7° ± 2.6° and 7.7 ± 1.8 mm and 3.8° ± 1.5° and 4.0 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, and for group A: 10.5° ± 3.4° and 8.7 ± 2.1 mm and 4.3° ± 1.8° and 4.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. Radiography revealed significantly improved postoperative outcomes in both groups (P < .0001). No significant differences in the score and any parameters on stress radiography were evident at 2 years after surgery between the groups. The mean time between surgery and return to full athletic activity was significantly higher in group I (18.5 ± 3.5 weeks) than in group A (13.4 ± 2.2 weeks) (P < .0001). No cases of reinjury were reported, and no differences in athletic performance ability were observed between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients in group A returned to full athletic activity 5 weeks earlier than those in group I, demonstrating the advantage of accelerated rehabilitation after surgery.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerated rehabilitation; ankle; lateral ligament; reconstructive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723416     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514527418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Bony landmarks available for minimally invasive lateral ankle stabilization surgery: a cadaveric anatomical study.

Authors:  Kentaro Matsui; Xavier Martin Oliva; Masato Takao; Bruno S Pereira; Tiago Mota Gomes; Jan Martinez Lozano; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Rehabilitation after anatomical ankle ligament repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher J Pearce; Yves Tourné; Jennifer Zellers; Romain Terrier; Pascal Toschi; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluation modalities for the anatomical repair of chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Christophe Meyer; Jon Karlsson; Romain Seil; Caroline Mouton; Eric Hamrin Senorski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Simultaneous ossicle resection and lateral ligament repair give excellent clinical results with an early return to physical activity in pediatric and adolescent patients with chronic lateral ankle instability and os subfibulare.

Authors:  Maya Kubo; Youichi Yasui; Jun Sasahara; Shinya Miki; Hirotaka Kawano; Wataru Miyamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Current concepts in the surgical management of chronic ankle lateral ligament instability.

Authors:  Shiluka Dias; Thomas L Lewis; Yousif Alkhalfan; Raju Ahluwalia; Robbie Ray
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 6.  Anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments: is there an optimal graft option?

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Romain Seil; Caroline Mouton; Sebastian Scheidt; Davide Cucchi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Posterolateral ankle ligament injuries affect ankle stability: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zhao-Jin Zhu; Yuan Zhu; Jing-Feng Liu; Yong-Ping Wang; Gang Chen; Xiang-Yang Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Review of Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Lateral Ankle Ligament Surgery.

Authors:  Christina Hermanns; Reed Coda; Sana Cheema; Matthew L Vopat; Megan Bechtold; Armin Tarakemeh; Scott Mullen; John Paul Schroeppel; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-06-25

9.  A new minimally invasive method for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a Tightrope system.

Authors:  Yongxing Cao; Yang Xu; Yuan Hong; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Early Versus Delayed Mobilization Post-Operative Protocols for Primary Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Alexander Wendling; Brennan Lee; Maaz Hassan; Brandon Morris; Armin Tarakemeh; Rosey Zackula; Scott Mullen; Paul Schroeppel; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.