Literature DB >> 24723137

Risk to pollinators from the use of chlorpyrifos in the United States.

G Christopher Cutler1, John Purdy, John P Giesy, Keith R Solomon.   

Abstract

CPY is an organophosphorus insecticide that is widely used in North American agriculture. It is non-systemic, comes in several sprayable and granular formulations,and is used on a number of high-acreage crops on which pollinators can forage,including tree fruits, alfalfa, corn, sunflower, and almonds. Bees (Apoidea) are the most important pollinators of agricultural crops in North America and were the main pollinators of interest in this risk assessment.The conceptual model identified a number of potential exposure pathways for pollinators, some more significant than others. CPY is classified as being highly toxic to honey bees by direct contact exposure. However, label precautions and good agricultural practices prohibit application of CPY when bees are flying and/or when flowering crops or weeds are present in the treatment area. Therefore, the risk of CPY to pollinators through direct contact exposure should be small. The main hazards for primary exposure for honey bees are dietary and contact exposure from flowers that were sprayed during application and remain available to bees after application. The main pathways for potential secondary exposure to CPY is through pollen and nectar brought to the hive by forager bees and the sublethal body burden of CPY carried on forager bees. Foraging for other materials, including water or propolis, does not appear to be an important exposure route. Since adult forager honey bees are most exposed, their protection from exposure via pollen, honey, and contact with plant surfaces is expected to be protective of other life stages and castes of honey bees.Tier- I approaches to estimate oral exposure to CPY through pollen and nectar/honey, the principle food sources for honey bees, suggested that CPY poses a risk to honey bees through consumption of pollen and nectar. However, a Tier-2 assessment of concentrations reported in pollen and honey from monitoring work in North America indicated there is little risk of acute toxicity from CPY through consumption of these food sources.Several models were also used to estimate upper-limit exposure of honey bees to CPY through consumption of water from puddles or dew. All models suggest that the risk of CPY is below the LOC for this pathway. Laboratory experiments with field-treated foliage, and semi-field and field tests with honey bees, bumble bees,and alfalfa leaf cutting bees indicate that exposure to foliage, pollen and/or nectar is hazardous to bees up to 3 d after application of CPY to a crop. Pollinators exposed to foliage, pollen or nectar after this time should be minimally affected.Several data gaps and areas of uncertainty were identified, which apply to CPYand other foliar insecticides. These primarily concern the lack of exposure and toxicological data on non-Apis pollinators. Overall, the rarity of reported bee kill incidents involving CPY indicates that compliance with the label precautions and good agricultural practice with the product is the norm in North American agriculture.Overall, we concluded that, provided label directions and good agricultural practices are followed, the use of CPY in agriculture in North America does not present an unacceptable risk to honeybees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723137     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03865-0_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  4 in total

1.  Measurements of Chlorpyrifos Levels in Forager Bees and Comparison with Levels that Disrupt Honey Bee Odor-Mediated Learning Under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Elodie Urlacher; Coline Monchanin; Coraline Rivière; Freddie-Jeanne Richard; Christie Lombardi; Sue Michelsen-Heath; Kimberly J Hageman; Alison R Mercer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Land conversion and pesticide use degrade forage areas for honey bees in America's beekeeping epicenter.

Authors:  Dan J Dixon; Haochi Zheng; Clint R V Otto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Queens become workers: pesticides alter caste differentiation in bees.

Authors:  Charles F Dos Santos; André L Acosta; Andressa L Dorneles; Patrick D S Dos Santos; Betina Blochtein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Assessing the toxicological interaction effects of imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and chlorpyrifos on Bombus terrestris based on the combination index.

Authors:  Yongkui Zhang; Dongqiang Zeng; Lu Li; Xiuchun Hong; Hongmei Li-Byarlay; Shudong Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.