| Literature DB >> 24722378 |
Jing Zhang1, Wei-da Wang2, Qi-Rong Geng2, Liang Wang2, Xiao-Qin Chen2, Cheng-Cheng Liu2, Yue Lv2.
Abstract
Interleukin-9 (IL-9) is more functionally diverse than previously expected, especially with regards to lymphomagenesis. However, the relationship between IL-9 and the clinicopathological features of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma is less well established. Patients with this lymphoma in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2003 and March 2013 were systematically reviewed in an intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline serum IL-9 levels were determined using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A total of seventy-four patients were enrolled in this study. The mean concentration of serum IL-9 for all patients was 6.48 pg/mL (range: 1.38-51.87 pg/mL). Age, B symptoms and local lymph node involvement were found to be related to high serum IL-9 levels. Patients with low IL-9 levels tended to have higher rates of complete remission. Notably, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the low IL-9 level group than in the high IL-9 level group (PFS: 68.7 months vs. 28.3 months, P<0.001; OS: 86 months vs. 42.8 months, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed independent prognostic factors for PFS. Similarly, high IL-9 levels (P = 0.003) and old age (P = 0.007) were independently predictive of shorter OS. Serum IL-9 is closely related to several clinical features, such as age, B symptoms and local lymph node involvement. It can also be a significant independent prognostic factor for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, which suggests a role for IL-9 in the pathogenesis of this disease and offers new insight into potential therapeutic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24722378 PMCID: PMC3983224 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics at baseline.
| Characteristics | No. | % |
| Gender, male | 56 | 75.7 |
| Age, y | ||
| Median (range) | 42.5 (13–76) | |
| ≤60 | 63 | 85.1 |
| ECOG performance status | ||
| 0 | 28 | 37.8 |
| 1–2 | 46 | 62.2 |
| B symptoms | 39 | 52.7 |
| Serum LDH (Elevated) | 23 | 31.1 |
| LN involvement | 39 | 52.7 |
| Ann Arbor stage | ||
| I | 32 | 43.2 |
| II | 30 | 40.5 |
| III–IV | 12 | 16.3 |
| IPI | ||
| 0–1 | 61 | 82.4 |
| 2–5 | 13 | 17.6 |
| KPI | ||
| 0 | 15 | 20.3 |
| 1 | 27 | 36.5 |
| 2 | 16 | 21.6 |
| 3–4 | 16 | 21.6 |
| Lymphocytes (<normal) | 23 | 31.1 |
| Monocytes (>normal) | 41 | 55.4 |
| Pretreatment serum IL-9 | ||
| Mean concentration, pg/mL (range) | 6.48 (1.38–51.87) | |
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase;
LN, local lymph node; IPI, international prognostic index; KPI, Korean prognostic index.
Figure 1Correlation between serum IL-9 levels and clinical features.
A: Serum IL-9 levels were significantly higher in patients with ENKTL than in healthy volunteers (P<0.001). B: Serum IL-9 levels in patients >60 years were significantly higher than in those ≤60 years (P = 0.042). C: Serum IL-9 levels in patients with B symptoms were significantly higher than in those without B symptoms (P = 0.009). D: Serum IL-9 levels in patients with local lymph node involvement were significantly higher than in those without local lymph node involvement (P = 0.011).
The differences of serum IL-9 levels in various clinical factors.
| Factors | No. | Average | Range |
|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 56 | 7.02 | 1.38–51.87 | 0.316 |
| Female | 18 | 4.78 | 1.62–23.52 | |
| Age | ||||
| ≤60 | 63 | 5.71 | 1.38–51.87 | 0.042 |
| >60 | 11 | 10.85 | 2.08–32.4 | |
| ECOG performance status | ||||
| 0 | 28 | 4.61 | 1.38–22.8 | 0.125 |
| 1–2 | 46 | 7.61 | 1.62–51.87 | |
| B symptoms | ||||
| Absent | 35 | 4.1 | 1.38–22.8 | 0.009 |
| Present | 39 | 8.61 | 1.62–51.87 | |
| Serum LDH | ||||
| Normal | 51 | 5.61 | 1.62–32.4 | 0.995 |
| >normal | 23 | 8.39 | 1.38–51.87 | |
| LN involvement | ||||
| Absent | 35 | 4.98 | 1.38–32.4 | 0.011 |
| Present | 39 | 7.82 | 1.66–51.87 | |
| Ann Arbor stage | ||||
| I | 32 | 5.17 | 1.38–32.4 | 0.084 |
| II | 30 | 7.76 | 1.62–51.87 | |
| III–IV | 12 | 6.74 | 1.69–24.82 | |
| IPI | ||||
| 0–1 | 62 | 6.38 | 1.38–51.87 | 0.125 |
| 2–5 | 12 | 6.99 | 2.62–24.82 | |
| KPI | ||||
| 0 | 15 | 5.16 | 1.38–32.4 | 0.284 |
| 1 | 27 | 5.74 | 1.62–29.28 | |
| 2 | 16 | 4.59 | 1.66–11.12 | |
| 3–4 | 16 | 10.84 | 1.69–51.87 | |
| Lymphocytes | ||||
| Normal | 51 | 7.56 | 1.38–51.87 | 0.25 |
| <normal | 23 | 4.07 | 1.62–23.52 | |
| Monocytes | ||||
| Normal | 33 | 6.4 | 1.38–32.4 | 0.724 |
| >normal | 41 | 6.54 | 1.62–51.87 |
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase;
LN, local lymph node; IPI, international prognostic index; KPI, Korean prognostic index.
Figure 2ROC curve analysis for the optimal cut-off point of serum IL-9.
The most discriminative cut-off concentration of serum IL-9 was 3.49 pg/mL with an AUC value of 0.799. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.5% and 73.7%, respectively.
Figure 3The survival for all patients.
A: Progression-free survival. B: Overall survival.
The 3-year survival rates according to various clinical factors.
| Factors | 3-y PFS (%) | 95% CI |
| 3-y OS (%) | 95% CI |
|
| Gender | 0.117 | 0.118 | ||||
| Male | 45.3 | 36.4–54.2 | 61.9 | 53.7–70.1 | . | |
| Female | 77.8 | 68–87.6 | 88.1 | 80.2–96 | ||
| Age | 0.011 | <0.001 | ||||
| ≤60 | 60 | 51.8–68.2 | 78.9 | 71.8–85.3 | ||
| >60 | 21.8 | 8.4–35.2 | 21.8 | 8.4–35.2 | ||
| ECOG performance status | 0.109 | 0.152 | ||||
| 0 | 60.4 | 48.5–72.3 | 76.7 | 66.8–86.6 | ||
| 1–2 | 52 | 43.6–60.4 | 63.9 | 55.7–72.1 | ||
| B symptoms | 0.122 | 0.285 | ||||
| Absent | 66.8 | 57.5–76.1 | 77.9 | 70.4–85.4 | ||
| Present | 43 | 32.8–53.2 | 61.2 | 51.5–70.9 | ||
| Serum LDH | 0.455 | 0.202 | ||||
| Normal | 57.3 | 48.8–65.8 | 70.5 | 62.7–78.3 | ||
| >normal | 44.7 | 29.6–59.8 | 68 | 58–78 | ||
| LN involvement | 0.005 | 0.071 | ||||
| Absent | 70.8 | 61.7–79.9 | 78.3 | 70.2–86.4 | ||
| Present | 35.2 | 23.7–46.7 | 58.7 | 48.3–69.1 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage | 0.042 | 0.304 | ||||
| I | 68.3 | 58.6–78 | 76.2 | 67.4–85 | ||
| II | 41.3 | 27.9–54.7 | 61.7 | 50.4–73 | ||
| III–IV | 41.7 | 27.5–55.9 | 66.7 | 53.1–80.3 | ||
| IPI | 0.067 | 0.053 | ||||
| 0–1 | 55.9 | 47.6–64.2 | 70.8 | 63.6–78 | ||
| 2–5 | 41.7 | 27.5–55.9 | 58.3 | 44.1–72.5 | ||
| KPI | 0.064 | 0.251 | ||||
| 0 | 66 | 51.9–80.1 | 73.5 | 60–87 | ||
| 1 | 67.9 | 58.2–77.6 | 75.3 | 66.3–84.3 | ||
| 2 | 34.4 | 9.4–59.4 | 53.5 | 30.6–76.4 | ||
| 3–4 | 20.1 | 4.5–35.7 | 59.1 | 46.1–72.1 | ||
| Lymphocytes | 0.286 | 0.217 | ||||
| Normal | 49.3 | 40.8–57.8 | 62.5 | 54.4–70.6 | ||
| <normal | 62.6 | 47–78.2 | 86.7 | 47.3–93.8 | ||
| Monocytes | 0.432 | 0.861 | ||||
| Normal | 51.6 | 41.5–61.7 | 69 | 60.1–77.9 | ||
| >normal | 53.5 | 42.4–64.6 | 67.3 | 57.4–77.2 | ||
| Serum IL-9 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||||
| ≤3.49 | 68.7 | 59.4–78 | 86 | 80.6–91.4 | ||
| >3.49 | 28.3 | 18.4–38.2 | 42.8 | 31.9–53.7 |
Abbreviations: PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LN, local lymph node; IPI, international prognostic index; KPI, Korean prognostic index
Figure 4The progression-free survival according to age (A) and serum IL-9 levels (B).
Figure 5The overall survival according to age (A) and serum IL-9 levels (B).
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival.
| PFS | OS | |||||
| Parameters |
| RR | 95% CI |
| RR | 95% CI |
| Age >60 years | 0.025 | 1.029 | 1.004–1.056 | 0.007 | 1.043 | 1.012–1.076 |
| LN involvement | 0.107 | 2.650 | 0.810–8.668 | 0.386 | 1.867 | 0.456–7.654 |
| Serum IL-9 (>3.49 pg/mL) | 0.001 | 3.541 | 1.626–7.714 | 0.003 | 4.377 | 1.628–11.766 |
| Ann Arbor stage (I vs. II vs. III–IV) | 0.945 | 0.979 | 0.535–1.791 | 0.972 | 1.013 | 0.496–2.068 |
Abbreviations: PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; LN, local lymph node.