Dagmara Mirowska-Guzel1, Grazyna Gromadzka2, Tadeusz Mendel2, Barbara Janus-Laszuk2, Justyna Dzierka2, Iwona Sarzynska-Dlugosz2, Andrzej Czlonkowski3, Anna Czlonkowska1. 1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland 2nd Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Ward, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland. 2. 2nd Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Ward, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland. 3. Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic factors, including gene polymorphisms, are promising in determining stroke rehabilitation outcome. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of the most attractive because of its role in neuroplasticity and brain repair. OBJECTIVE: The aim of present study was to assess the role of BDNF -196 G≯A (val66met) and -270 C≯T on clinical parameters and functional outcome in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Additional analyses according to sex and age (≤55 and ≯55 years) were performed. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients (287 with ischemic and 51 with hemorrhagic stroke) were evaluated in terms of neurological deficit (National Institute of Heath Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), activities of daily living (Barthel Index [BI]), and everyday functionality (Rankin score [RS]) before and after rehabilitation. BDNF polymorphism genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: In multivariative analysis, unfavorable outcome of stroke rehabilitation (RS ≥2) was associated with independent factors: ischemic stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% CI, 1.03-6.47), female gender (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.39-5.64), depression (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.45-12.35), falls (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.16-5.87), and BDNF -196 GG polymorphism (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.09-4.35). The differences of functional parameters measured with BI and RS on admission and at discharge are apparent only for comparisons between patients ≤55 and ≯55 years old carrying BDNF -196 GA+AA genotypes but not in those carrying -196 GG genotype; the differences were evident in women but not in men. CONCLUSIONS: BDNF -196 G≯A polymorphism might affect functional outcome of stroke rehabilitation, but this hypothesis needs further verification.
BACKGROUND: Genetic factors, including gene polymorphisms, are promising in determining stroke rehabilitation outcome. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of the most attractive because of its role in neuroplasticity and brain repair. OBJECTIVE: The aim of present study was to assess the role of BDNF -196 G≯A (val66met) and -270 C≯T on clinical parameters and functional outcome in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Additional analyses according to sex and age (≤55 and ≯55 years) were performed. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients (287 with ischemic and 51 with hemorrhagic stroke) were evaluated in terms of neurological deficit (National Institute of Heath Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), activities of daily living (Barthel Index [BI]), and everyday functionality (Rankin score [RS]) before and after rehabilitation. BDNF polymorphism genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: In multivariative analysis, unfavorable outcome of stroke rehabilitation (RS ≥2) was associated with independent factors: ischemic stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% CI, 1.03-6.47), female gender (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.39-5.64), depression (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.45-12.35), falls (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.16-5.87), and BDNF -196 GG polymorphism (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.09-4.35). The differences of functional parameters measured with BI and RS on admission and at discharge are apparent only for comparisons between patients ≤55 and ≯55 years old carrying BDNF -196 GA+AA genotypes but not in those carrying -196 GG genotype; the differences were evident in women but not in men. CONCLUSIONS:BDNF -196 G≯A polymorphism might affect functional outcome of stroke rehabilitation, but this hypothesis needs further verification.
Authors: Liisa A M Galea; Karyn M Frick; Elizabeth Hampson; Farida Sohrabji; Elena Choleris Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Ceren Eyileten; Małgorzata Zaremba; Piotr K Janicki; Marek Rosiak; Agnieszka Cudna; Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Grzegorz Opolski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Dariusz A Kosior; Dagmara Mirowska-Guzel; Marek Postula Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2016-01-07