Michael A Tynan1, Daniel Morris2, Tara Weston3. 1. Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, Office of the State Public Health Director, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2. Portland, Oregon, USA. 3. Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Section, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2009, a US$21.95 per pound disparity was created in the Federal excise tax between roll-your-own cigarette tobacco (RYO) and pipe tobacco in the USA. After this disparity was created, pipe tobacco sales increased and RYO sales declined as some manufacturers repackaged roll-your-own tobacco as pipe tobacco and retailers began to offer cigarette rolling machines for consumers to use. A Federal law was passed in 2012 limiting the availability of these machines, however, it was unclear what impact this law had on the sales of roll-your-own tobacco labelled as pipe tobacco. METHODS: The quantity of RYO sold as pipe tobacco each month was estimated using objective data on Federal excise taxes. RESULTS: From April 2009 through June 2013, 107 million pounds of RYO were sold as pipe tobacco, reducing Federal excise tax collections by US$2.36 billion. The amount of RYO taxed as pipe tobacco climbed steadily and then levelled off following the July 2012 Federal law. CONCLUSIONS: The Federal law did not correct the market shift that occurred in pipe and RYO sales beginning in 2009. Even without access to commercial rolling machines, smokers are continuing to take advantage of the tax disparity. Without a solution, states will continue to lose revenue, and smokers who would otherwise quit will continue to have a low-cost alternative product available for purchase. Potential solutions include: (1) US Treasury Department distinguishing between RYO and pipe tobacco based on physical characteristics and (2) changing the Federal excise tax so that RYO and pipe tobacco are taxed at the same rate. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: In 2009, a US$21.95 per pound disparity was created in the Federal excise tax between roll-your-own cigarette tobacco (RYO) and pipe tobacco in the USA. After this disparity was created, pipe tobacco sales increased and RYO sales declined as some manufacturers repackaged roll-your-own tobacco as pipe tobacco and retailers began to offer cigarette rolling machines for consumers to use. A Federal law was passed in 2012 limiting the availability of these machines, however, it was unclear what impact this law had on the sales of roll-your-own tobacco labelled as pipe tobacco. METHODS: The quantity of RYO sold as pipe tobacco each month was estimated using objective data on Federal excise taxes. RESULTS: From April 2009 through June 2013, 107 million pounds of RYO were sold as pipe tobacco, reducing Federal excise tax collections by US$2.36 billion. The amount of RYO taxed as pipe tobacco climbed steadily and then levelled off following the July 2012 Federal law. CONCLUSIONS: The Federal law did not correct the market shift that occurred in pipe and RYO sales beginning in 2009. Even without access to commercial rolling machines, smokers are continuing to take advantage of the tax disparity. Without a solution, states will continue to lose revenue, and smokers who would otherwise quit will continue to have a low-cost alternative product available for purchase. Potential solutions include: (1) US Treasury Department distinguishing between RYO and pipe tobacco based on physical characteristics and (2) changing the Federal excise tax so that RYO and pipe tobacco are taxed at the same rate. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Sarah Joseph; Nicolle M Krebs; Junjia Zhu; Yijin Wert; Reema Goel; Samantha M Reilly; Dongxiao Sun; John P Richie; Ivan Nikiforov; Pramil Cheriyath; Joshua E Muscat Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Xu Wang; Xin Xu; Michael A Tynan; Robert B Gerzoff; Ralph S Caraballo; Gabbi R Promoff Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Teresa W Wang; Brandon Kenemer; Michael A Tynan; Tushar Singh; Brian King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Anushree Sharma; Brian V Fix; Cristine Delnevo; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 2.692