| Literature DB >> 24721559 |
Leandro Lauriti, Lara Jansiski Motta, Camila Haddad Leal de Godoy, Daniela Aparecida Biasotto-Gonzalez, Fabiano Politti, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Sandra Kalil Bussadori1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyse the influence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) on electromyographic activity in the masseter and temporal muscles of adolescents and investigate a possible association with the number of occlusal contacts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24721559 PMCID: PMC3991888 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Distribution of volunteers according to degree of TMD and gender
| | | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | N | 16 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 42 |
| | | % | 38.1% | 54.8% | 7.1% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| | Female | N | 5 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 39 |
| | | % | 12.8% | 46.2% | 35.9% | 5.1% | 100.0% |
| Total | N | 21 | 41 | 17 | 2 | 81 | |
| % | 25.9% | 50.6% | 21.0% | 2.5% | 100.0% | ||
Fisher’s exact test.
Intra-class correlation coefficient calculated for subjects without TMD (WG), with mild TMD (MG) and with moderate to severe TMD (MSG)
| | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.78 | |
| 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.69 | |
| 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.75 | |
| 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.91 | |
Figure 1Mean and SD of RMS (%MVC) value recorded in resting position; RMS of right and left masseter and termporal muscles compared between without TMD (WG), with mild TMD (MG) and with moderate to severe TMD (MSG); *Significant difference ( < 0.05; Dunn’s post-hoc test).
Mean (SD) of the RMS values (%MVC) of right and left masseter and temporal muscles in individuals without TMD (WG), with mild TMD (MG) and with moderate to severe TMD (MSG)
| | | | | |
| Right temporal | 2.93 ± 1.53 | 2.55 ± 1.49 | 20.61 ± 10.87 | <0.001* |
| Right masseter | 2.14 ± 0.81 | 1.71 ± 0.59 | 23.85 ± 14.25 | <0.001* |
| Left temporal | 3.18 ± 2.17 | 2.47 ± 1.21 | 29.11 ± 18.78 | <0.001* |
| Left masseter | 2.08 ± 0.63 | 2.35 ± 1.59 | 21.89 ± 12.97 | <0.001* |
| | | | | |
| Right temporal | 74.17 ± 8.60 | 72.20 ± 20.12 | 68.95 ± 8.37 | 0.10 |
| Right masseter | 67.59 ± 27.41 | 66.32 ± 66.83 | 66.83 ± 11.12 | 0.77 |
| Left temporal | 70.49 ± 11.61 | 75.81 ± 11.50 | 67.18 ± 12.75 | 0.21 |
| Left masseter | 74.07 ± 12.86 | 68.40 ± 11.02 | 64.99 ± 7.94 | 0.44 |
| | | | | |
| Right temporal | 36.83 ± 13.95 | 42.31 ± 17.29 | 45.48 ± 13.03 | 0.32 |
| Right masseter | 38.02 ± 15.13 | 44.44 ± 17.34 | 46.11 ± 14.15 | 0.40 |
| Left temporal | 38.02 ± 15.13 | 44.44 ± 17.34 | 46.11 ± 14.15 | 0.51 |
| Left masseter | 35.03 ± 12.11 | 44.76 ± 15.94 | 46.62 ± 18.82 | 0.15 |
*Significant difference (p < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 2Typical raw EMG signal of right temporal (RT) and masseter (RM) muscles and left temporal (LT) and masseter (LM) muscles from patient in MSG recorded in resting position, maximum intercuspation and chewing.
Spearman’s correlation coefficients () for occlusal contacts (OC) and RMS (% MVC) in individuals without TMD (WG), with mild TMD (MG) and with moderate to severe TMD (MSG)
| Right temporal | 0.03 | 0.89 | 0.18 | 0.51 | −0.10 | 0.71 |
| Right masseter | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.29 | −0.44 | 0.11 |
| Left temporal | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.55 |
| Left masseter | 0.48 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.43 |