Literature DB >> 24721126

Anatomical study of the effects of five surgical maneuvers on palate movement.

Derick A Mendonca1, Kamlesh B Patel2, Gary B Skolnick2, Albert S Woo2.   

Abstract

The anatomy of the palate has been extensively described, with a predominant focus on palatal musculature. There are no biomechanical studies investigating the effects of surgical maneuvers on the palate to aid cleft closure. This study aims to describe the soft tissue attachments at different zones and quantify the movement following their release. Fourteen adult cadaver heads were dissected. The palates were split in the midline and five maneuvers described: Step 1, over the hard palate; Step 2, around the greater palatine pedicle; Step 3, over the palatine aponeurosis; Step 4, over the hamulus; and Step 5, resulting in a hamulus fracture. The movements across the midline at the posterior nasal spine following each maneuver were measured. The age range of the 14 heads was between 60 -75 years. Completion of steps 1 and 2 over the hard palate obtained a mean release of 2.6 and 2.0 mm, respectively. The largest movements occurred at Step 3 (5.7 mm) and Step 4 (3.5 mm), after releasing attachments at the posterior hard palate and palatine aponeurosis. Steps 3 and 4 dissections exhibited cumulative release, with a maximum movement with Step 3 (p < 0.05). Isolated fracture of the hamulus (Step 5) yielded a mean movement of 1.4 mm. Individual steps of dissection are described with respect to releasing soft tissue attachments. Medial movement of the oral mucosa is quantified with each step of dissection. The greatest release occurred with dissection overlying the palatine aponeurosis posterior to the hard/soft palate junction. Additional dissection along the hamulus (without fracture) added significantly to this release.
Copyright © 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical; Cadaver study; Movement; Palate dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24721126     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Incidence of Palatal Fistula at Time of Secondary Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction.

Authors:  Vikram A Shankar; Alison Snyder-Warwick; Gary B Skolnick; Albert S Woo; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-02-22

2.  Five surgical maneuvers on nasal mucosa movement in cleft palate repair: A cadaver study.

Authors:  Dennis C Nguyen; Kamlesh B Patel; Rajiv P Parikh; Gary B Skolnick; Albert S Woo
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations.

Authors:  Priyanka Naidu; Caroline A Yao; David K Chong; William P Magee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Modified double-opposing Z-plasty for patients with Veau I cleft palate: Are lateral relaxing incisions necessary?

Authors:  Hyung Joon Seo; Rafael Denadai; Dax Carlo Go Pascasio; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.