George S Downward1, Wei Hu2, David Large3, Harry Veld4, Jun Xu5, Boris Reiss6, Guoping Wu7, Fusheng Wei7, Robert S Chapman8, Nat Rothman2, Lan Qing2, Roel Vermeulen6. 1. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.s.downward@uu.nl. 2. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, UK. 4. Deltares, Department of Applied Microbiology and Geochemistry, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 6. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 7. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing, China. 8. College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Xuanwei and Fuyuan counties in Yunnan Province, China have among the highest lung cancer rates in the country. This has been associated with the domestic combustion of bituminous coal (referred to as "smoky" coal). Additionally, significant geographical variation in cancer rates among smoky coal users has been observed, suggesting heterogeneity in fuel source composition and/or combustion characteristics. Research thus far has indicated that smoky coal emits high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and contains high concentrations of fine grained crystalline quartz, however, much of this research is limited in terms of sample size and geographic scope. In order to more fully characterise geochemical and elemental compositions of smoky and smokeless coal use in Xuanwei and Fuyuan, we carried out a large exposure assessment study in households in this region. METHODS: Fuel samples representing smoky and "smokeless" (anthracite, the major alternative coal type in the region) coals were collected from 137 homes in Xuanwei and Fuyuan. Rock-Eval, Leco-CS, XRF analysis and electron microscopy were used to establish hydrocarbon content (to represent volatile organic compounds), major and trace element composition and mineral composition respectively. Heterogeneity in coal characteristics between and within coal types was assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: 145 coal samples (116 smoky and 29 smokeless coals) were analysed. Statistically significant differences between smoky and smokeless coals with regard to hydrocarbon content, sulfur, trace elements and mineral composition were observed. Of note, smoky coal contained between 5 and 15 times the amount of volatile organic matter and twice the amount of quartz (including respirable quartz) than smokeless coal. Smoky coal generally had lower levels of trace elements (plus aluminium) than smokeless coal. Significant variation was also observed between smoky coal samples from different geographical areas with regard to hydrocarbon content and elemental composition (including aluminium and silicon). DISCUSSION: This paper has identified compositional differences between and within smoky and smokeless coals sourced from Xuanwei and Fuyuan counties. A decreased ratio of aluminium to silicon in smoky coal suggests elevated free silica, a finding consistent with observed higher levels of quartz. Elevated volatile organic matter content in smoky coal (when compared to smokeless coal) is consistent with the geochemical expectations for smoky and smokeless coals. These findings also reflect previous observations of elevated volatile compound emissions (notably PAHs) from smoky coal in the area. The observed heterogeneity in coal composition between and within coal types may provide leads to the observed heterogeneity in cancer risk observed in this area.
BACKGROUND: Xuanwei and Fuyuan counties in Yunnan Province, China have among the highest lung cancer rates in the country. This has been associated with the domestic combustion of bituminous coal (referred to as "smoky" coal). Additionally, significant geographical variation in cancer rates among smoky coal users has been observed, suggesting heterogeneity in fuel source composition and/or combustion characteristics. Research thus far has indicated that smoky coal emits high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and contains high concentrations of fine grained crystalline quartz, however, much of this research is limited in terms of sample size and geographic scope. In order to more fully characterise geochemical and elemental compositions of smoky and smokeless coal use in Xuanwei and Fuyuan, we carried out a large exposure assessment study in households in this region. METHODS: Fuel samples representing smoky and "smokeless" (anthracite, the major alternative coal type in the region) coals were collected from 137 homes in Xuanwei and Fuyuan. Rock-Eval, Leco-CS, XRF analysis and electron microscopy were used to establish hydrocarbon content (to represent volatile organic compounds), major and trace element composition and mineral composition respectively. Heterogeneity in coal characteristics between and within coal types was assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: 145 coal samples (116 smoky and 29 smokeless coals) were analysed. Statistically significant differences between smoky and smokeless coals with regard to hydrocarbon content, sulfur, trace elements and mineral composition were observed. Of note, smoky coal contained between 5 and 15 times the amount of volatile organic matter and twice the amount of quartz (including respirable quartz) than smokeless coal. Smoky coal generally had lower levels of trace elements (plus aluminium) than smokeless coal. Significant variation was also observed between smoky coal samples from different geographical areas with regard to hydrocarbon content and elemental composition (including aluminium and silicon). DISCUSSION: This paper has identified compositional differences between and within smoky and smokeless coals sourced from Xuanwei and Fuyuan counties. A decreased ratio of aluminium to silicon in smoky coal suggests elevated free silica, a finding consistent with observed higher levels of quartz. Elevated volatile organic matter content in smoky coal (when compared to smokeless coal) is consistent with the geochemical expectations for smoky and smokeless coals. These findings also reflect previous observations of elevated volatile compound emissions (notably PAHs) from smoky coal in the area. The observed heterogeneity in coal composition between and within coal types may provide leads to the observed heterogeneity in cancer risk observed in this area.
Authors: J L Mumford; X Z He; R S Chapman; S R Cao; D B Harris; X M Li; Y L Xian; W Z Jiang; C W Xu; J C Chuang Journal: Science Date: 1987-01-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Laumann; V Micić; M A Kruge; C Achten; R F Sachsenhofer; J Schwarzbauer; T Hofmann Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: H Dean Hosgood; Roel Vermeulen; Hu Wei; Boris Reiss; Joseph Coble; Fusheng Wei; Xu Jun; Guoping Wu; Nat Rothman; Qing Lan Journal: Int J Environ Health Res Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jason Y Y Wong; Wei Hu; George S Downward; Wei Jie Seow; Bryan A Bassig; Bu-Tian Ji; Fusheng Wei; Guoping Wu; Jihua Li; Jun He; Chin-San Liu; Wen-Ling Cheng; Yunchao Huang; Kaiyun Yang; Ying Chen; Nathaniel Rothman; Roel C Vermeulen; Qing Lan Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Teresa W Wang; Roel C H Vermeulen; Wei Hu; Gang Liu; Xiaohui Xiao; Yuriy Alekseyev; Jun Xu; Boris Reiss; Katrina Steiling; George S Downward; Debra T Silverman; Fusheng Wei; Guoping Wu; Jihua Li; Marc E Lenburg; Nathaniel Rothman; Avrum Spira; Qing Lan Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Jason Y Y Wong; Bryan A Bassig; Wei Hu; Wei Jie Seow; Meredith S Shiels; Bu-Tian Ji; George S Downward; Yunchao Huang; Kaiyun Yang; Jihua Li; Jun He; Ying Chen; Allan Hildesheim; Roel Vermeulen; Qing Lan; Nathaniel Rothman Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2019-05-13
Authors: Sixin S Lu; Hasmik Grigoryan; William M B Edmands; Wei Hu; Anthony T Iavarone; Alan Hubbard; Nathaniel Rothman; Roel Vermeulen; Qing Lan; Stephen M Rappaport Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: George S Downward; Wei Hu; Nat Rothman; Boris Reiss; Peter Tromp; Guoping Wu; Fusheng Wei; Jun Xu; Wei Jie Seow; Robert S Chapman; Qing Lan; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: G S Downward; W Hu; N Rothman; B Reiss; G Wu; F Wei; J Xu; W J Seow; B Brunekreef; R S Chapman; L Qing; R Vermeulen Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: W J Seow; G S Downward; H Wei; N Rothman; B Reiss; J Xu; B A Bassig; J Li; J He; H D Hosgood; G Wu; R S Chapman; L Tian; F Wei; N E Caporaso; R Vermeulen; Q Lan Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Bryan A Bassig; H Dean Hosgood; Xiao-Ou Shu; Roel Vermeulen; Bingshu E Chen; Hormuzd A Katki; Wei Jie Seow; Wei Hu; Lützen Portengen; Bu-Tian Ji; Jason Y Y Wong; Bofu Ning; George S Downward; Jihua Li; Kaiyun Yang; Gong Yang; Yu-Tang Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Teja Nagaradona; Wei Zheng; Debra T Silverman; Yunchao Huang; Qing Lan Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196