Literature DB >> 24720815

Maximum bite force following unilateral implant-supported prosthetic treatment: within-subject comparison to opposite dentate side.

M K Al-Omiri1, M G Sghaireen, M M Alhijawi, I A Alzoubi, C D Lynch, E Lynch.   

Abstract

Bite force is a significant component of chewing and masticatory function. The literature lacks studies that compare bite force values of implant-supported fixed bridges to natural dentition within same subjects. The objective of the study was to assess maximum occlusal bite force (MBF) among patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis and compare it to their opposite dentate side and also to determine the effect of gender, age and Body Mass Index (BMI) on maximum occlusal bite force. Forty patients (20 males and 20 females, mean age = 42.7 ± 9.6 years) with an implant-supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitation on one side and dentate on the other side were recruited into this study. Participants' MBF were measured bilaterally at the first molar region using a digital hydraulic occlusal force gauge (GM10). The measurements were repeated three times (with 45 s intervals between times) for each side, and the highest value of the bite force (MBF) was recorded for each side. The mean MBF was 577.9 N at the implant-supported prosthesis side and 595.1 N at the dentate side. The average MBF was higher at the dentulous side (P < 0.05). Maximum occlusal bite force was higher in males and participants with higher weight and height. However, BMI was not significantly related to MBF values. Maximum occlusal bite force values at the dentate side were slightly (3%) but significantly higher than MBF at implant-supported prosthesis side. Males, taller patients and patients with higher weights had higher MBF values. Body mass index was not significantly related to MBF values.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bite force; bite force recording devices; bite gauge; implant-supported prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720815     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  11 in total

1.  Low-Profile Electromagnetic Field Sensors in the Measurement and Modelling of Three-Dimensional Jaw Kinematics and Occlusal Loading.

Authors:  Sarah C Woodford; Dale L Robinson; Cornelia Edelmann; Albert Mehl; Oliver Röhrle; Peter Vee Sin Lee; David C Ackland
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Influence of dental implantation on bone mineral density distribution: a pilot study.

Authors:  Damian Jae-Whan Lee; Eun-Sang Moon; Kenneth Stephen; Jie Liu; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.989

3.  Craniomandibular System and Postural Balance after 3-Day Dry Immersion.

Authors:  Loïc Treffel; Liubov Dmitrieva; Guillemette Gauquelin-Koch; Marc-Antoine Custaud; Stéphane Blanc; Claude Gharib; Catherine Millet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Maximum bite force following unilateral fixed prosthetic treatment: a within-subject comparison to the dentate side.

Authors:  Bader K Al-Zarea
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Primary Teeth Bite Marks Analysis on Various Materials: A Possible Tool in Children Health Risk Analysis and Safety Assessment.

Authors:  Nikola Jovanovic; Bojan Petrovic; Sanja Kojic; Milica Sipovac; Dejan Markovic; Sofija Stefanovic; Goran Stojanovic
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported 3Y-TZP-Zirconia Cantilevers: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mariana Novais; António Sérgio Silva; Joana Mendes; Pedro Barreiros; Carlos Aroso; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  In situ microradioscopy and microtomography of fatigue-loaded dental two-piece implants.

Authors:  Wolfram Wiest; Simon Zabler; Alexander Rack; Christian Fella; Andreas Balles; Katja Nelson; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Randolf Hanke
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.616

8.  A CBCT Based Three-Dimensional Assessment of Mandibular Posterior Region for Evaluating the Possibility of Bypassing the Inferior Alveolar Nerve While Placing Dental Implants.

Authors:  Mohammed G Sghaireen; Kumar Chandan Srivastava; Deepti Shrivastava; Kiran Kumar Ganji; Santosh R Patil; Anas Abuonq; Mohammed Assayed Mousa; Najla Dar-Odeh; Ghazi M Sghaireen; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-14

9.  Relationships of Stresses on Alveolar Bone and Abutment of Dental Implant from Various Bite Forces by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoning Kang; Yiming Li; Yixi Wang; Yao Zhang; Dongsheng Yu; Yun Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.