Literature DB >> 24720663

Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: an fMRI study.

Tapani Riekki1, Marjaana Lindeman, Tuukka T Raij.   

Abstract

A host of research has attempted to explain why some believe in the supernatural and some do not. One suggested explanation for commonly held supernatural beliefs is that they are a by-product of theory of mind (ToM) processing. However, this does not explain why skeptics with intact ToM processes do not believe. We employed fMRI to investigate activation differences in ToM-related brain circuitries between supernatural believers (N = 12) and skeptics (N = 11) while they watched 2D animations of geometric objects moving intentionally or randomly and rated the intentionality of the animations. The ToM-related circuitries in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were localized by contrasting intention-rating-related and control-rating-related brain activation. Compared with the skeptics, the supernatural believers rated the random movements as more intentional and had stronger activation of the ToM-related circuitries during the animation with random movement. The strength of the ToM-related activation covaried with the intentionality ratings. These findings provide evidence that differences in ToM-related activations are associated with supernatural believers' tendency to interpret random phenomena in mental terms. Thus, differences in ToM processing may contribute to differences between believing and unbelieving.

Keywords:  Intentionality; Supernatural beliefs; Theory of mind; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720663     DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2014.906366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  6 in total

Review 1.  Religion and morality.

Authors:  Ryan McKay; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do.

Authors:  David L R Maij; Frenk van Harreveld; Will Gervais; Yann Schrag; Christine Mohr; Michiel van Elk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Religiosity and Psychotic Ideation in Stable Schizophrenia: A Role for Empathic Perspective-Taking.

Authors:  Rosó Duñó; Joan Carles Oliva; Adolf Tobeña; Diego Palao; Javier Labad
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Paranormal Experience Profiles and Their Association With Variations in Executive Functions: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Graham Drinkwater; Neil Dagnall; Andrew Denovan; Andrew Parker; Álex Escolà-Gascón
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  You Don't See What I See: Individual Differences in the Perception of Meaning from Visual Stimuli.

Authors:  Timea R Partos; Simon J Cropper; David Rawlings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Flowers in the Attic: Lateralization of the detection of meaning in visual noise.

Authors:  Simon J Cropper; Ashlan McCauley; O Scott Gwinn; Megan Bartlett; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.