Literature DB >> 24720570

Usefulness and safety of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.

Jung Yeon Seo1, Su Jin Hong, Jae Pil Han, Hee Yoon Jang, Yu Sik Myung, Cheol Kim, Yun Nah Lee, Bong Min Ko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Safety and efficacy data on endoscopic treatment of duodenal neoplasm are limited. We suggest the technical feasibility of endoscopic procedures by evaluating the results of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma with or without malignant transformation between September 2003 and March 2012 were included. Endoscopic polypectomy of duodenal polyp (DPP), duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (DEMR), and duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (DESD) were selected as endoscopic treatments for each lesion.
RESULTS: Mean lesion size was 9.1 mm, and most lesions were located in the second portion of the duodenum. There were 40 adenomas and five early-stage adenocarcinomas arising from adenomas. Of the 45 duodenal neoplasms, five patients were treated with DPP, 33 with DEMR, and seven patients with a large duodenal lesion underwent DESD. Minimum of 1-year follow-up endoscopies were performed in 42 patients, excepting three patients treated after October 2011. Median follow-up was 24.8 months. Of the 45 patients, en bloc resection was performed in 43 (95.6%). A complete resection was performed in 41 patients (91.1%). No significant bleeding events occurred. Perforations occurred in three patients who underwent DESD. All perforations were noticed during the procedures and completely closed by endoscopic clipping. There was one recurrence at 6 months after DPP.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment is minimally invasive management for duodenal adenomas and superficial adenocarcinomas. It would be helpful for medical doctors in the management of duodenal neoplasms.
© 2014 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; duodenal neoplasms; endoscopy gastrointestinal; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720570     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  11 in total

1.  Safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal subepithelial lesions with wound closure using clips and an endoloop: an analysis of 68 cases.

Authors:  Li-Ping Ye; Xin-Li Mao; Hai-Hong Zheng; Yu Zhang; Ling-Yan Shen; Xian-Bin Zhou; Lin-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Kyung Lim Hwang; Gwang Ha Kim; Bong Eun Lee; Moon Won Lee; Dong Hoon Baek; Geun Am Song
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Endoscopic resection for duodenal subepithelial tumors: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kim; Gwang Ha Kim; Do Youn Park; Sangjeong Ahn; Won Lim; Bon Eun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic and surgical management of nonampullary duodenal neoplasms.

Authors:  Michael J Bartel; Ruchir Puri; Bhaumik Brahmbhatt; Wei-Chung Chen; Daniel Kim; Carlos Roberto Simons-Linares; John A Stauffer; Mauricia A Buchanan; Steven P Bowers; Timothy A Woodward; Michael B Wallace; Massimo Raimondo; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Shintaro Fujihara; Hirohito Mori; Hideki Kobara; Noriko Nishiyama; Tae Matsunaga; Maki Ayaki; Tatsuo Yachida; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Nonampullary duodenal adenoma: Current understanding of its diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Lim; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Novel Approach for Endoscopic Management of Duodenal Injury during Perirenal Infected Haematoma Drainage after Shock-Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Dmitry Gorelov; Alexander Smirnov; Salman Al-Shukri; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2018-06-13

9.  Comparative analysis of ESD versus EMR in a large European series of non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors.

Authors:  Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles; Lucille Quénéhervé; Walter Margos; Leila Shaza; Hrvoje Ivekovic; Tom G Moreels; Ralph Yeung; Hubert Piessevaux; Emmanuel Coron; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 10.  ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles; Lucille Quénéhervé; Walter Margos; Tom G Moreels; Ralph Yeung; Hubert Piessevaux; Emmanuel Coron; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.