OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the literature on interventions targeting tertiary education staff within colleges and universities for improvements in health behaviors such as physical activity, dietary intake, and weight loss. DATA SOURCE: One online database, Medline, was searched for literature published between January 1970 and February 2013. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: All quantitative study designs, including but not limited to randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, nonrandomized experimental trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies, were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed by one reviewer using a standardized form developed by the researchers. Extraction was checked for accuracy and consistency by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data in relation to the above objective were extracted and described in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified that focused on staff within the tertiary education setting. The review yielded overall positive results with 13 reporting significant health-related improvements. Weight loss, physical activity and fitness, and/or nutrition were the focus in more than half (n = 9) of the studies. CONCLUSION: This appears to be the first review to examine health interventions for tertiary education staff. There is scope to enhance cross-disciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of a "Healthy University" settings-based approach to health promotion in tertiary education workplaces. Universities or colleges could serve as a research platform to evaluate such intervention strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the literature on interventions targeting tertiary education staff within colleges and universities for improvements in health behaviors such as physical activity, dietary intake, and weight loss. DATA SOURCE: One online database, Medline, was searched for literature published between January 1970 and February 2013. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: All quantitative study designs, including but not limited to randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, nonrandomized experimental trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies, were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed by one reviewer using a standardized form developed by the researchers. Extraction was checked for accuracy and consistency by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data in relation to the above objective were extracted and described in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified that focused on staff within the tertiary education setting. The review yielded overall positive results with 13 reporting significant health-related improvements. Weight loss, physical activity and fitness, and/or nutrition were the focus in more than half (n = 9) of the studies. CONCLUSION: This appears to be the first review to examine health interventions for tertiary education staff. There is scope to enhance cross-disciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of a "Healthy University" settings-based approach to health promotion in tertiary education workplaces. Universities or colleges could serve as a research platform to evaluate such intervention strategies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colleges; Health Behavior; Health Promotion; Health focus: fitness/physical activity, nutrition, smoking control, stress management, weight control; Healthy University; Manuscript format: literature review; Research purpose: intervention testing/program evaluation; Setting: workplace; Strategy: behavior change; Study design: quantitative; Outcome measure: behavioral; Systematic Review; Target population circumstances: not applicable; Target population: adults; Tertiary Education Institutions; Universities; University Staff
Authors: Kenton J Johnston; Jason M Hockenberry; Kimberly J Rask; Lynn Cunningham; Kenneth L Brigham; Greg S Martin Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Lynn P Clemow; Thomas G Pickering; Karina W Davidson; Joseph E Schwartz; Virginia P Williams; Jonathan A Shaffer; Redford B Williams; William Gerin Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 3.046