Literature DB >> 24719969

Assessing care integration for dual-eligible beneficiaries: a review of quality measures chosen by states in the financial alignment initiative.

Sabiha Zainulbhai1, Lee Goldberg2, Ng Weiwen3, Anne H Montgomery4.   

Abstract

Caring for the 9 million low-income elderly or disabled adults who are eligible for full benefits under both Medicare and Medicaid can be extremely costly. As part of the federal Financial Alignment Initiative, states have the opportunity to test care models for dual-eligibles that integrate acute care, behavioral health and mental health services, and long-term services and supports, with the goals of enhancing access to services, improving care quality, containing costs, and reducing administrative barriers. One of the challenges in designing these demonstrations is choosing and applying measures that accurately track changes in quality over time—essential for the rapid identification of effective innovations. This brief reviews the quality measures chosen by eight demonstration states as of December 2013. The authors find that while some quality domains are well represented, others are not. Quality-of-life measures are notably lacking, as are informative, standardized measures of long-term services and supports.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24719969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)        ISSN: 1558-6847


  2 in total

1.  Policy Research Challenges in Comparing Care Models for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Janet H Van Cleave; Brian L Egleston; Sarah Brosch; Elizabeth Wirth; Molly Lawson; Eileen M Sullivan-Marx; Mary D Naylor
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2017-07-24

2.  The adverse consequences of unmet need among older persons living in the community: dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries.

Authors:  Susan M Allen; Elizabeth R Piette; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.