| Literature DB >> 24719645 |
Sisi Xi1, Eckehard Liske2, Shuyu Wang3, Jianli Liu4, Zhonglan Zhang4, Li Geng5, Lina Hu6, Chunfeng Jiao7, Shurong Zheng1, Hans-Heinrich Henneicke-von Zepelin8, Wenpei Bai1.
Abstract
Objective. Effect of isopropanolic Cimicifuga racemosa extract (iCR) on uterine fibroid size compared with tibolone. Method. The randomized, double-blind, controlled study in China enrolled 244 patients aged 40-60 years with menopausal symptoms (Kupperman Menopause Index ≥ 15). The participants were treated with either iCR of 40 mg crude drug/day (N = 122) or tibolone 2.5 mg/day (N = 122) orally for 3 months in 2004. Now, we investigated the subset of all women (N = 62) with at least one uterine fibroid at onset of treatment for the effect of iCR (N = 34) on fibroid size compared with tibolone (N = 28) by transvaginal ultrasonography. Results. The median myoma volume decreased upon iCR by as much as -30% (P = 0.016) but increased upon tibolone by +4.7%. The percentage of volume change, mean diameter change and geometric mean diameter change of the iCR group compared to tibolone were statistically significant (P = 0.016, 0.021, 0.016 respectively). Conclusion. Our results suggest that iCR (Remifemin) is a valid herbal medicinal product in patients with uterine myomas as it provides adequate relief from menopausal symptoms and inhibits growth of the myomas in contrast to tibolone.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24719645 PMCID: PMC3955607 DOI: 10.1155/2014/717686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Demographic and other baseline characteristics (mean ± SD).
| iCR | Tibolone (N = 28) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.6 ± 3.0 | 51.5 ± 4.6 | 0.304 |
| Duration of amenorrhea (months) | 31.5 ± 23.9 | 32.4 ± 25.7 | 0.896 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.1 ± 2.5 | 23.5 ± 2.5 | 0.526 |
| KMI | 24.9 ± 6.1 | 26.2 ± 5.9 | 0.409 |
| Age at menarche (years) | 14.9 ± 2.1 | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 0.238 |
| Number of pregnancies | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 0.754 |
| Serum estradiol (mg/dL) | 54.0 ± 45.6 | 56.3 ± 38.6 | 0.835 |
| Serum FSH (U/mL) | 83.7 ± 33.2 | 78.5 ± 29.2 | 0.518 |
| Thickness of uterine intima (mm) | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 0.535 |
Changes of volume, mean, and geometric mean diameter of the largest myoma per patient during the treatment. Median and interquartile range (IQR) are shown for the volume parameters for which normal distribution was rejected, and mean ± SD is shown for the diameter parameters for which normal distribution was not rejected. P values for intergroup comparison by Mann-Whitney U test.
| Group | iCR | Tibolone | P |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 34 | 28 | |
| Volume (mm³) | |||
| Visit 1 | 1787 (559; 6107) | 1063 (520; 8060) | 0.35 |
| Visit 3 | 1086 (0; 5991) | 1096 (448; 4695) | 0.91 |
| Volume change (%) |
|
|
|
| Mean diameter (mm) | |||
| Visit 1 | 18.7 ± 10.6 | 16.5 ± 10.7 | 0.37 |
| Visit 3 | 15.1 ± 12.8 | 14.8 ± 8.5 | 0.85 |
| Mean diameter change (%) | −25.6 ± 47.6 | +6.6 ± 54.7 |
|
| Geometric mean diameter (mm) | |||
| Visit 1 | 18.6 ± 10.5 | 16.0 ± 9.2 | 0.35 |
| Visit 3 | 14.8 ± 12.9 | 14.4 ± 8.9 | 0.91 |
| Geometric mean diameter Change (%) | −26.6 ± 48.8 | +6.1 ± 58.0 |
|
Figure 1Individual data on the size of the largest myoma in each of the 34 patients in the iCR group and the 28 patients in the tibolone group.
Odds ratio of response from treatment. Response is defined as decrease of myoma size throughout the treatment. The table shows the final logistic regression model after stepwise backward elimination procedure with the treatment group fixed in the model and nonrelevant confounders stepwise eliminated if exceeding the threshold α < 0.10. The starting model included body mass index (BMI), number of pregnancies, age at menarche, serum estradiol at baseline, FSH at baseline, age, duration of amenorrhea, duration of climacteric complaints, and the KMI at baseline as putative confounders.
| Variable |
| S.E. |
| Exp( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | −1.544 | 0.578 |
|
|
| Serum estradiol at baseline | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.092 | 1.013 |
| Kupperman index at baseline | −0.091 | 0.055 | 0.098 | 0.913 |
| Constant | 4.063 | 1.628 | 0.013 | 58.165 |