Literature DB >> 24719285

Re-estimating sample size in cluster randomised trials with active recruitment within clusters.

S van Schie1, M Moerbeek.   

Abstract

Often only a limited number of clusters can be obtained in cluster randomised trials, although many potential participants can be recruited within each cluster. Thus, active recruitment is feasible within the clusters. To obtain an efficient sample size in a cluster randomised trial, the cluster level and individual level variance should be known before the study starts, but this is often not the case. We suggest using an internal pilot study design to address this problem of unknown variances. A pilot can be useful to re-estimate the variances and re-calculate the sample size during the trial. Using simulated data, it is shown that an initially low or high power can be adjusted using an internal pilot with the type I error rate remaining within an acceptable range. The intracluster correlation coefficient can be re-estimated with more precision, which has a positive effect on the sample size. We conclude that an internal pilot study design may be used if active recruitment is feasible within a limited number of clusters.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  a priori power analysis; hierarchical data; intracluster correlation coefficient; type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24719285     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Impact of complex, partially nested clustering in a three-arm individually randomized group treatment trial: A case study with the wHOPE trial.

Authors:  Guangyu Tong; Karen H Seal; William C Becker; Fan Li; James D Dziura; Peter N Peduzzi; Denise A Esserman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Effectiveness and working mechanisms of the InConnection approach in multi-problem families: study protocol of a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Natasha Koper; Hanneke E Creemers; Susan Branje; Geert Jan J M Stams; Levi van Dam
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Sample size calculation in multi-centre clinical trials.

Authors:  Markus Harden; Tim Friede
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Efficient design of cluster randomized trials with treatment-dependent costs and treatment-dependent unknown variances.

Authors:  Gerard J P van Breukelen; Math J J M Candel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander; James M S Wason
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander; James M S Wason
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Sample sizes for cluster-randomised trials with continuous outcomes: Accounting for uncertainty in a single intra-cluster correlation estimate.

Authors:  Jen Lewis; Steven A Julious
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Interim data monitoring in cluster randomised trials: Practical issues and a case study.

Authors:  K Hemming; J Martin; I Gallos; A Coomarasamy; L Middleton
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.486

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.