Helena Luginbuehl1,2, Jean-Pierre Baeyens2, Jan Taeymans1,2, Ida-Maria Maeder3, Annette Kuhn4, Lorenz Radlinger1. 1. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Health, Bern, Switzerland. 2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Brussel, Belgium. 3. University of Bern, University Library of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Women's Hospital, Urogynaecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIMS: A better understanding of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) activation and strength components is a prerequisite to get better insight in PFM contraction mechanisms and develop more specific PFM-training regimens for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) patients. The aim of this systematic review (2012:CRD42012002547) was to evaluate and summarize existing studies investigating PFM activation and strength components influencing female continence and SUI. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature from January 1980 to November 2013 for cross-sectional studies comparing female SUI patients with healthy controls and intervention studies with SUI patients reporting on the association between PFM activation and strength components and urine loss. Trial characteristics, evaluated PFM components, their definitions, measurement methods, study outcomes, as well as quality measures, based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool, were independently extracted. The high heterogeneity of the retrieved data made pooling of results impossible and therefore restricted the analysis to a systematic review. RESULTS: Cross-sectional studies showed group differences in favor of the continent women compared to SUI patients for PFM activation or PFM maximal strength, mean strength or sustained contraction. All intervention studies showed an improvement of PFM strength and decrease in urine loss in SUI patients after physical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher PFM activation and strength components influence female continence positively. This systematic review underscored the need for a standardized PFM components' terminology (similar to rehabilitation and training science), standardized test procedures and well matched diagnostic instruments.
AIMS: A better understanding of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) activation and strength components is a prerequisite to get better insight in PFM contraction mechanisms and develop more specific PFM-training regimens for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) patients. The aim of this systematic review (2012:CRD42012002547) was to evaluate and summarize existing studies investigating PFM activation and strength components influencing female continence and SUI. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature from January 1980 to November 2013 for cross-sectional studies comparing female SUI patients with healthy controls and intervention studies with SUI patients reporting on the association between PFM activation and strength components and urine loss. Trial characteristics, evaluated PFM components, their definitions, measurement methods, study outcomes, as well as quality measures, based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool, were independently extracted. The high heterogeneity of the retrieved data made pooling of results impossible and therefore restricted the analysis to a systematic review. RESULTS: Cross-sectional studies showed group differences in favor of the continent women compared to SUI patients for PFM activation or PFM maximal strength, mean strength or sustained contraction. All intervention studies showed an improvement of PFM strength and decrease in urine loss in SUI patients after physical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher PFM activation and strength components influence female continence positively. This systematic review underscored the need for a standardized PFM components' terminology (similar to rehabilitation and training science), standardized test procedures and well matched diagnostic instruments.
Authors: Magdalena Piernicka; Monika Błudnicka; Damian Bojar; Jakub Kortas; Anna Szumilewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Il Gyu Ko; Jin Woo Jeong; Young Hoon Kim; Yong Seok Jee; Sung Eun Kim; Sang Hoon Kim; Jun Jang Jin; Chang Ju Kim; Kyung Jin Chung Journal: Int Neurourol J Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 2.835