PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion changes in the breast tumor-stromal boundary and adjacent tissue in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HR-DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with invasive breast cancer were imaged with HR-DWI before and early during treatment. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was plotted in 1-mm increments around the tumor boundary. Early change in ADC was measured for tumor, tumor boundary, and stromal regions, and the relationship to treatment response was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations between treatment response and early changes in ADC were found for: (i) whole tumor (ρ = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.58, 0.99), P = 0.003); (ii) tumor rim (ρ = 0.75, 95% CI = (-0.007, 0.96), P = 0.05); and (iii) boundary transition region (ρ = 0.86, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.01). Early change in ADC of distal stroma had a marginally statistically significant positive correlation to treatment response (ρ = 0.71, 95% CI = (-0.084, 0.95), P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Proximity-dependent evaluation of HR-DWI data in the breast tumor-stromal boundary and adjacent tissue may provide information about response to therapy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion changes in the breast tumor-stromal boundary and adjacent tissue in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HR-DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with invasive breast cancer were imaged with HR-DWI before and early during treatment. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was plotted in 1-mm increments around the tumor boundary. Early change in ADC was measured for tumor, tumor boundary, and stromal regions, and the relationship to treatment response was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations between treatment response and early changes in ADC were found for: (i) whole tumor (ρ = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.58, 0.99), P = 0.003); (ii) tumor rim (ρ = 0.75, 95% CI = (-0.007, 0.96), P = 0.05); and (iii) boundary transition region (ρ = 0.86, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.01). Early change in ADC of distal stroma had a marginally statistically significant positive correlation to treatment response (ρ = 0.71, 95% CI = (-0.084, 0.95), P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Proximity-dependent evaluation of HR-DWI data in the breast tumor-stromal boundary and adjacent tissue may provide information about response to therapy.
Authors: Lisa Singer; Lisa J Wilmes; Emine U Saritas; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Evelyn Proctor; Dorota J Wisner; Belinda Chang; Bonnie N Joe; Dwight G Nishimura; Nola M Hylton Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: S C Partridge; H Rahbar; R Murthy; X Chai; B F Kurland; W B DeMartini; C D Lehman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jose I Lopez; Inkyung Kang; Weon-Kyoo You; Donald M McDonald; Valerie M Weaver Journal: Integr Biol (Camb) Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Paul Hansma; Hongmei Yu; David Schultz; Azucena Rodriguez; Eugene A Yurtsev; Jessica Orr; Simon Tang; Jon Miller; Joseph Wallace; Frank Zok; Cheng Li; Richard Souza; Alexander Proctor; Davis Brimer; Xavier Nogues-Solan; Leonardo Mellbovsky; M Jesus Peña; Oriol Diez-Ferrer; Phillip Mathews; Connor Randall; Alfred Kuo; Carol Chen; Mathilde Peters; David Kohn; Jenni Buckley; Xiaojuan Li; Lisa Pruitt; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Tamara Alliston; Valerie Weaver; Jeffrey Lotz Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Paolo P Provenzano; David R Inman; Kevin W Eliceiri; Steven M Trier; Patricia J Keely Journal: Biophys J Date: 2008-09-05 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: A Fangberget; L B Nilsen; K H Hole; M M Holmen; O Engebraaten; B Naume; H-J Smith; D R Olsen; T Seierstad Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Paolo P Provenzano; Kevin W Eliceiri; Jay M Campbell; David R Inman; John G White; Patricia J Keely Journal: BMC Med Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mika Jokinen; Karen Pittois; Suzanne van den Akker; Inge Gutschoven; Tatu Assmuth; Tapio Metz; Hanna Lehtilä; Pekka Alanne Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Lei Deng; Qiu-Ping Wang; Rui Yan; Xiao-Yi Duan; Lu Bai; Nan Yu; You-Min Guo; Quan-Xin Yang Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Nathaniel Braman; Prateek Prasanna; Jon Whitney; Salendra Singh; Niha Beig; Maryam Etesami; David D B Bates; Katherine Gallagher; B Nicolas Bloch; Manasa Vulchi; Paulette Turk; Kaustav Bera; Jame Abraham; William M Sikov; George Somlo; Lyndsay N Harris; Hannah Gilmore; Donna Plecha; Vinay Varadan; Anant Madabhushi Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-04-05
Authors: Rustem F Baikeev; Roman A Gubanov; Kamil K Sadikov; Sufiya Z Safina; Farhat F Muhamadiev; Timur A Sibgatullin Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2014-12-08
Authors: Ella F Jones; Deep K Hathi; Rita Freimanis; Rita A Mukhtar; A Jo Chien; Laura J Esserman; Laura J Van't Veer; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Ahmad Algohary; Rakesh Shiradkar; Shivani Pahwa; Andrei Purysko; Sadhna Verma; Daniel Moses; Ronald Shnier; Anne-Maree Haynes; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Sreeharsha Tirumani; Amr Mahran; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Lee Ponsky; Phillip D Stricker; Anant Madabhushi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 6.639