Literature DB >> 24719084

The value of magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of repaired menisci.

Burcin Kececi1, Elcil Kaya Bicer, Remide Arkun, Mehmet Argin, Emin Taskiran.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in detection of re-torn or unhealed menisci which were previously repaired.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six menisci of 24 symptomatic patients who had undergone a meniscus repair surgery were included in this retrospective study. These patients had been evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced direct MR arthrography. A subsequent second-look arthroscopy was performed thereafter. The findings of MR arthrography were compared with the arthroscopic findings.
RESULTS: Sixteen recurrent meniscal lesions were detected with MR arthrography; the remaining ten repaired menisci were evaluated as healed. At second-look arthroscopy, six out of 26 repaired menisci were evaluated as completely healed. Eight of them had incomplete healing, and 12 of them were unhealed. MR arthrography had four false-negative results, but there were none false-positive results. It was arthroscopically shown that three of these four false-negative results were belonged to patients who had incomplete healing. MR arthrography had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 80, 100, and 84.6 %, respectively. When incomplete lesions were left out of analysis, its sensitivity and accuracy reached to 94.8 and 94.4 %.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study showed that MR arthrography was a reliable diagnostic tool in evaluating previously repaired menisci. Yet diagnosis of incomplete meniscal lesions seemed to be challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24719084     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1450-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  19 in total

1.  Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography.

Authors:  Lawrence M White; Mark E Schweitzer; Dominik Weishaupt; Josef Kramer; Aileen Davis; Paul H Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Meniscus repair.

Authors:  K E DeHaven
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Meniscal tears: MR and arthrographic findings after arthroscopic repair.

Authors:  T E Farley; S M Howell; K F Love; R D Wolfe; C H Neumann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee.

Authors:  Thomas R McCauley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  MR imaging and MR arthrography for diagnosis of recurrent tears in the postoperative meniscus.

Authors:  Arthur A De Smet
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Repeat tear of postoperative meniscus: potential MR imaging signs.

Authors:  P S Lim; M E Schweitzer; M Bhatia; V Giuliano; P P Kaneriya; R M Senyk; M Oliveri; W Johnson; B Amster; L Parker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnostic values of 3 methods for evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair: comparison among second-look arthroscopy, clinical assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yu Miao; Jia-Kuo Yu; Ying-Fang Ao; Zhuo-Zhao Zheng; Xi Gong; Kevin Kar Ming Leung
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Imaging the post-operative meniscus.

Authors:  Andoni P Toms; Lawrence M White; Thomas J Marshall; Simon T Donell
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 9.  Meniscus preservation; rationale, repair techniques and results.

Authors:  Kevin T Boyd; Peter T Myers
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  MR arthrography of postoperative knee: for which patients is it useful?

Authors:  Thomas Magee; Marc Shapiro; John Rodriguez; David Williams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Higher healing rate after meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction for tears located in vascular zone 1 compared to zone 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L M Gerritsen; T J N van der Lelij; S Keereweer; P B A A van Driel; P van Schie; M Fiocco; E R A van Arkel; R G Zuurmond
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Knee meniscal retears after repair: A systematic review comparing diagnostic imaging modalities.

Authors:  Saad Syed; Mohammed Nagdi Zaki; Jeyaseelan Lakshmanan; Rik Kundra
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.657

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.