Literature DB >> 24718490

Acropetal leaflet initiation of Eschscholzia californica is achieved by constant spacing of leaflets and differential growth of leaf.

Momoko Ikeuchi1, Hisako Igarashi, Kiyotaka Okada, Hirokazu Tsukaya.   

Abstract

In compound leaves, leaflet primordia are initiated directionally along the lateral sides. Our understanding of the molecular basis of leaflet initiation has improved, but the regulatory mechanisms underlying spatio-temporal patterns remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of acropetal (from the base to the tip) progression of leaflet initiation in Eschscholzia californica. We established an ultraviolet-laser ablation system to manipulate compound-leaf development. Local ablation at the leaflet incipient site generated leaves with asymmetric morphology. In the majority of cases, leaflets that were initiated on the ablated sides shifted apically. Finite time-course observation revealed that the timing of leaflet initiation was delayed, but the distance from the leaf tip did not decrease. These results were suggestive of the local spacing mechanism in leaflet initiation, whereby the distance from the leaf tip and adjacent pre-existing leaflet determines the position of leaflet initiation. To understand how such a local patterning mechanism generates a global pattern of successive leaflet initiation, we assessed the growth rate gradient along the apical-basal axis. Our time-course analysis revealed differential growth rates along the apical-basal axis of the leaf, which can explain the acropetal progression of leaflet initiation. We propose that a leaflet is initiated at a site where the distances from pre-existing leaflets and the leaf tip are sufficient. Furthermore, the differential growth rate may be a developmental factor underlying the directionality of leaflet initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24718490     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-014-2071-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  26 in total

Review 1.  Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts?

Authors:  Connie Champagne; Neelima Sinha
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Phyllotaxis as a physical self-organized growth process.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1992-03-30       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Microsurgical and laser ablation analysis of leaf positioning and dorsoventral patterning in tomato.

Authors:  Didier Reinhardt; Martin Frenz; Therese Mandel; Cris Kuhlemeier
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves.

Authors:  Yael Berger; Smadar Harpaz-Saad; Arnon Brand; Hadas Melnik; Neti Sirding; John Paul Alvarez; Michael Zinder; Alon Samach; Yuval Eshed; Naomi Ori
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  The Aquilegia FRUITFULL-like genes play key roles in leaf morphogenesis and inflorescence development.

Authors:  Natalia Pabón-Mora; Bharti Sharma; Lynn D Holappa; Elena M Kramer; Amy Litt
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Lobe-generating centres in the simple leaves of Myriophyllum aquaticum: evidence for KN1-like activity.

Authors:  Laura Bourque; Christian Lacroix
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Expression patterns of STM-like KNOX and Histone H4 genes in shoot development of the dissected-leaved basal eudicot plants Chelidonium majus and Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae).

Authors:  Edwin P Groot; Neelima Sinha; Stefan Gleissberg
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Mechanisms of leaf tooth formation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Eiko Kawamura; Gorou Horiguchi; Hirokazu Tsukaya
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Compound leaf development and evolution in the legumes.

Authors:  Connie E M Champagne; Thomas E Goliber; Martin F Wojciechowski; Raymond W Mei; Brad T Townsley; Kan Wang; Margie M Paz; R Geeta; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Alignment between PIN1 polarity and microtubule orientation in the shoot apical meristem reveals a tight coupling between morphogenesis and auxin transport.

Authors:  Marcus G Heisler; Olivier Hamant; Pawel Krupinski; Magalie Uyttewaal; Carolyn Ohno; Henrik Jönsson; Jan Traas; Elliot M Meyerowitz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  On the evolution of developmental mechanisms: Divergent polarities in leaf growth as a case study.

Authors:  Mainak Das Gupta; Utpal Nath
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2016

2.  Branch regeneration induced by sever damage in the brown alga Dictyota dichotoma (dictyotales, phaeophyceae).

Authors:  Atsuko Tanaka; Yoichiro Hoshino; Chikako Nagasato; Taizo Motomura
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  A developmental model for branching morphogenesis of lake cress compound leaf.

Authors:  Akiko Nakamasu; Hokuto Nakayama; Naomi Nakayama; Nobuhiko J Suematsu; Seisuke Kimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Auxin influx importers modulate serration along the leaf margin.

Authors:  Ania Kasprzewska; Ross Carter; Ranjan Swarup; Malcolm Bennett; Nick Monk; Jamie K Hobbs; Andrew Fleming
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 6.417

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.