Glenn M Eastwood1, Paul J Young, Rinaldo Bellomo. 1. aDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia bIntensive Care Unit, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand cAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the impact of oxygen and carbon dioxide management on patient outcomes following cardiac arrest. RECENT FINDINGS: Although there are no data that suggest that supplemental oxygen administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is harmful, there is concern that 100% oxygen during the postresuscitation phase may be undesirable. The evidence to avoid hyperoxia is limited to animal studies and retrospective clinical studies that examine the association between exposure and outcome. There is a correlation between end-tidal carbon dioxide values during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation outcome, yet this correlation is likely to reflect low or absent cardiac output and be a biomarker of illness severity rather than a mediator of injury. Additionally, very limited high-level human data exist on the relationship between arterial carbon dioxide tension and outcome following cardiac arrest. Retrospective studies have identified hypocapnia in the intensive care unit as being independently associated with worse neurological and mortality outcomes in cardiac arrest patients. Although there appears to be sufficient evidence to recommend avoiding hypocapnia after resuscitation, observational data suggest that hypercapnia may be independently associated with a greater likelihood of discharge home amongst cardiac arrest survivors. SUMMARY: Current data for oxygen and carbon dioxide management following resuscitation suggest that hyperoxia and hypocapnia may be injurious and should be avoided, and that mild hypercapnia may increase the likelihood of discharge home amongst survivors. Such data should be viewed as hypothesis generating. Randomized controlled trials have commenced to clarify the safety, feasibility and efficacy of targeting different oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions following cardiac arrest.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the impact of oxygen and carbon dioxide management on patient outcomes following cardiac arrest. RECENT FINDINGS: Although there are no data that suggest that supplemental oxygen administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is harmful, there is concern that 100% oxygen during the postresuscitation phase may be undesirable. The evidence to avoid hyperoxia is limited to animal studies and retrospective clinical studies that examine the association between exposure and outcome. There is a correlation between end-tidal carbon dioxide values during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation outcome, yet this correlation is likely to reflect low or absent cardiac output and be a biomarker of illness severity rather than a mediator of injury. Additionally, very limited high-level human data exist on the relationship between arterial carbon dioxide tension and outcome following cardiac arrest. Retrospective studies have identified hypocapnia in the intensive care unit as being independently associated with worse neurological and mortality outcomes in cardiac arrestpatients. Although there appears to be sufficient evidence to recommend avoiding hypocapnia after resuscitation, observational data suggest that hypercapnia may be independently associated with a greater likelihood of discharge home amongst cardiac arrest survivors. SUMMARY: Current data for oxygen and carbon dioxide management following resuscitation suggest that hyperoxia and hypocapnia may be injurious and should be avoided, and that mild hypercapnia may increase the likelihood of discharge home amongst survivors. Such data should be viewed as hypothesis generating. Randomized controlled trials have commenced to clarify the safety, feasibility and efficacy of targeting different oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions following cardiac arrest.
Authors: Bernd E Winkler; Ralf M Muellenbach; Thomas Wurmb; Manuel F Struck; Norbert Roewer; Peter Kranke Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Ozan Akca; Lorenzo Ball; F Javier Belda; Peter Biro; Andrea Cortegiani; Arieh Eden; Carlos Ferrando; Luciano Gattinoni; Zeev Goldik; Cesare Gregoretti; Thomas Hachenberg; Göran Hedenstierna; Harriet W Hopf; Thomas K Hunt; Paolo Pelosi; Motaz Qadan; Daniel I Sessler; Marina Soro; Mert Şentürk Journal: Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Date: 2017-08-01
Authors: Arne Diehl; Aidan J C Burrell; Andrew A Udy; Peta M A Alexander; Peter T Rycus; Ryan P Barbaro; Vincent A Pellegrino; David V Pilcher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Hendrik J F Helmerhorst; Marcus J Schultz; Peter H J van der Voort; Evert de Jonge; David J van Westerloo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Hendrik J F Helmerhorst; Marie-José Roos-Blom; David J van Westerloo; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Nicolette F de Keizer; Evert de Jonge Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Yuda Sutherasan; Oscar Peñuelas; Alfonso Muriel; Maria Vargas; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Iole Brunetti; Konstantinos Raymondos; Davide D'Antini; Niklas Nielsen; Niall D Ferguson; Bernd W Böttiger; Arnaud W Thille; Andrew R Davies; Javier Hurtado; Fernando Rios; Carlos Apezteguía; Damian A Violi; Nahit Cakar; Marco González; Bin Du; Michael A Kuiper; Marco Antonio Soares; Younsuck Koh; Rui P Moreno; Pravin Amin; Vinko Tomicic; Luis Soto; Hans-Henrik Bülow; Antonio Anzueto; Andrés Esteban; Paolo Pelosi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 9.097