Quang A Le 1 , Jason N Doctor , Lori A Zoellner , Norah C Feeny . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD ) may depend on type of treatment (eg, pharmacotherapy vs psychotherapy ) and patient choice of treatment. We examined the cost-effectiveness of treatment with prolonged exposure therapy versus pharmacotherapy with sertraline , overall treatment preference, preference for choosing prolonged exposure therapy , and preference for choosing pharmacotherapy with sertraline from the US societal perspective. METHOD: Two hundred patients aged 18 to 65 years with PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-IV criteria enrolled in a doubly randomized preference trial . Patients were randomized to receive their treatment of choice (n = 97) or to be randomly assigned treatment (n = 103). In the choice arm, patients chose either prolonged exposure therapy (n = 61) or pharmacotherapy with sertraline (n = 36). In the no-choice arm, patients were randomized to either prolonged exposure therapy (n = 48) or pharmacotherapy with sertraline (n = 55). The total costs, including direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs , were estimated in 2012 US dollars; and total quality-adjusted life-year (QALY ) was assessed using the EuroQoL Questionnaire-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) instrument in a 12-month period. This study was conducted from July 2004 to January 2009 . RESULTS: Relative to pharmacotherapy with sertraline , prolonged exposure therapy was less costly (-$262; 95% CI, -$5,068 to $4,946) and produced more QALYs (0.056; 95% CI, 0.014 to 0.100) when treatment was assigned, with 93.2% probability of being cost-effective at $100,000/QALY. Independently, giving a choice of treatment also yielded lower cost (-$1,826; 95% CI, -$4,634 to $749) and more QALYs (0.010; 95% CI, -0.019 to 0.044) over no choice of treatment, with 87.0% probability of cost-effectiveness at $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Giving PTSD patients a choice of treatment appears to be cost-effective. When choice is not possible, prolonged exposure therapy may provide a cost-effective option over pharmacotherapy with sertraline . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00127673. © Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD ) may depend on type of treatment (eg, pharmacotherapy vs psychotherapy) and patient choice of treatment. We examined the cost-effectiveness of treatment with prolonged exposure therapy versus pharmacotherapy with sertraline , overall treatment preference, preference for choosing prolonged exposure therapy, and preference for choosing pharmacotherapy with sertraline from the US societal perspective. METHOD: Two hundred patients aged 18 to 65 years with PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-IV criteria enrolled in a doubly randomized preference trial. Patients were randomized to receive their treatment of choice (n = 97) or to be randomly assigned treatment (n = 103). In the choice arm, patients chose either prolonged exposure therapy (n = 61) or pharmacotherapy with sertraline (n = 36). In the no-choice arm, patients were randomized to either prolonged exposure therapy (n = 48) or pharmacotherapy with sertraline (n = 55). The total costs, including direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs, were estimated in 2012 US dollars; and total quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was assessed using the EuroQoL Questionnaire-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) instrument in a 12-month period. This study was conducted from July 2004 to January 2009. RESULTS: Relative to pharmacotherapy with sertraline , prolonged exposure therapy was less costly (-$262; 95% CI, -$5,068 to $4,946) and produced more QALYs (0.056; 95% CI, 0.014 to 0.100) when treatment was assigned, with 93.2% probability of being cost-effective at $100,000/QALY. Independently, giving a choice of treatment also yielded lower cost (-$1,826; 95% CI, -$4,634 to $749) and more QALYs (0.010; 95% CI, -0.019 to 0.044) over no choice of treatment, with 87.0% probability of cost-effectiveness at $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Giving PTSD patients a choice of treatment appears to be cost-effective. When choice is not possible, prolonged exposure therapy may provide a cost-effective option over pharmacotherapy with sertraline . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00127673. © Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2014
PMID: 24717377 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13m08719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-6689 Impact factor: 4.384