Suzanne R Sharpton1, Sandy Feng, Bilal Hameed, Francis Yao, Jennifer C Lai. 1. 1 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 2 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 3 Address correspondence to: Jennifer C. Lai, M.D., M.B.A., 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-357, Box 0538, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The proportion of older patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is rising. Although increased age and LT-MELD are known to increase the risk of graft loss, no studies have explored whether there is a synergistic effect between LT-age and LT-MELD. METHODS: All US adult, non-Status 1 recipients of primary deceased donor LT from 2/05 to 1/10 without MELD exceptions were included (n=15,677). Recipients were categorized by LT-age [18-59 yr (n=11,966), 60-64 yr (n=2181), 65-69 yr (n=1177), and ≥70 yr (n=343)] and LT-MELD [low (<20, n=5290), mid (20-27, n=5112), and high (≥28, n=5265)]. Adjusted Cox models evaluated the independent and combined effects of LT-age and LT-MELD on graft loss (death or re-LT). RESULTS: LT-age ≥70 yr (HR=1.65, 95% CI 1.08-1.82) and LT-MELD ≥28 (HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.02-1.47) were independently associated with increased risk of graft loss (P<0.001). In a model allowing for the interaction between LT-age and LT-MELD, the risk of graft loss for recipients ≥70 years with MELD ≥28 was higher than predicted by the additive model (HR=2.38, 95% CI 1.73-3.27, P<0.001) resulting in 1-year graft survival of 56%. However, the increased risk of graft loss in recipients ≥70 years was attenuated at lower LT-MELD <28. Furthermore, the interaction term was not significant for any other LT-age and LT-MELD combination. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that recipients should not be excluded solely based on age; however, LT for recipients ≥70 years at high LT-MELD scores should be undertaken cautiously.
BACKGROUND: The proportion of older patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is rising. Although increased age and LT-MELD are known to increase the risk of graft loss, no studies have explored whether there is a synergistic effect between LT-age and LT-MELD. METHODS: All US adult, non-Status 1 recipients of primary deceased donor LT from 2/05 to 1/10 without MELD exceptions were included (n=15,677). Recipients were categorized by LT-age [18-59 yr (n=11,966), 60-64 yr (n=2181), 65-69 yr (n=1177), and ≥70 yr (n=343)] and LT-MELD [low (<20, n=5290), mid (20-27, n=5112), and high (≥28, n=5265)]. Adjusted Cox models evaluated the independent and combined effects of LT-age and LT-MELD on graft loss (death or re-LT). RESULTS: LT-age ≥70 yr (HR=1.65, 95% CI 1.08-1.82) and LT-MELD ≥28 (HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.02-1.47) were independently associated with increased risk of graft loss (P<0.001). In a model allowing for the interaction between LT-age and LT-MELD, the risk of graft loss for recipients ≥70 years with MELD ≥28 was higher than predicted by the additive model (HR=2.38, 95% CI 1.73-3.27, P<0.001) resulting in 1-year graft survival of 56%. However, the increased risk of graft loss in recipients ≥70 years was attenuated at lower LT-MELD <28. Furthermore, the interaction term was not significant for any other LT-age and LT-MELD combination. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that recipients should not be excluded solely based on age; however, LT for recipients ≥70 years at high LT-MELD scores should be undertaken cautiously.
Authors: Michael R Charlton; Justin M Burns; Rachel A Pedersen; Kymberly D Watt; Julie K Heimbach; Ross A Dierkhising Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Philipp Dutkowski; Christian E Oberkofler; Ksenija Slankamenac; Milo A Puhan; Erik Schadde; Beat Müllhaupt; Andreas Geier; Pierre A Clavien Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M F Levy; P S Somasundar; L W Jennings; G J Jung; E P Molmenti; C G Fasola; R M Goldstein; T A Gonwa; G B Klintmalm Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Timothy J S Cross; Charalambos G Antoniades; Paolo Muiesan; Thawab Al-Chalabi; Varuna Aluvihare; Kosh Agarwal; Bernard C Portmann; Mohammed Rela; Nigel D Heaton; John G O'Grady; Michael A Heneghan Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: J Ignacio Herrero; Juan Felipe Lucena; Jorge Quiroga; Bruno Sangro; Fernando Pardo; Fernando Rotellar; Javier Alvárez-Cienfuegos; Jesús Prieto Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Nina Weiler; Andreas Schlotmann; Andreas Anton Schnitzbauer; Stefan Zeuzem; Martin-Walter Welker Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Connie W Wang; Kenneth E Covinsky; Sandy Feng; Hilary Hayssen; Dorry L Segev; Jennifer C Lai Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Jacqueline B Henson; Yuval A Patel; Julius M Wilder; Jiayin Zheng; Shein-Chung Chow; Lindsay Y King; Andrew J Muir Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 3.199