Literature DB >> 24716458

Comparison of pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and pharmacodynamics of liposomal and free doxorubicin in tumour-bearing mice following intratumoral injection.

Shuangxia Ren1, Cuiyun Li, Yu Dai, Ning Li, Xin Wang, Fengjie Tian, Sufeng Zhou, Zhixia Qiu, Yang Lu, Di Zhao, Xijing Chen, Dingding Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The clinical application of doxorubicin (DOX) is limited by severe systemic side effects. The aim of this study was to develop a strategy that combined the liposomal DOX (LipDOX) and intratumoral injection to reduce the toxicity and enhance the antitumor efficiency.
METHODS: The pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and pharmacodynamics of LipDOX compared with free DOX were investigated by intratumoral injection in murine H22 hepatoma-bearing mice at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight. A sensitive HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method was used to determine the DOX levels in plasma and tissues. The tumour volume and body weight of mice were measured every 3 days. KEY
FINDINGS: LipDOX administration resulted in 1.3-fold longer mean residence time (MRT) and 2.4-fold higher area under concentration (AUC)-time curve compared with free DOX administration in tumour. Free DOX caused higher peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) than LipDOX in plasma and major organs, which may result in significant mortality for acute cardiac toxicity. After successive 21 days treatment, the final volume of tumour treated by normal saline, free DOX and LipDOX was 5.0-, 1.3-fold higher and 1.6-fold lower than the initial tumour volume, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that the intratumoral injection of LipDOX is a promising approach with higher therapeutic efficacy and lower systemic toxicity than free DOX.
© 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intratumoral injection; liposomal doxorubicin; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; tissue distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24716458     DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  6 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for improving the intratumoral distribution of liposomal drugs in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Beth Goins; William T Phillips; Ande Bao
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 2.  Lipid based nanoparticles as a novel treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive review on targeting and recent advances.

Authors:  Khaled Mahmoud; Shady Swidan; Mohamed El-Nabarawi; Mahmoud Teaima
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 10.435

3.  The antimicrobial peptide pardaxin exerts potent anti-tumor activity against canine perianal gland adenoma.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Pan; Chao-Nan Lin; Ming-Tang Chiou; Chao Yuan Yu; Jyh-Yih Chen; Chi-Hsien Chien
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-02-10

4.  Co-delivery of doxorubicin and curcumin by pH-sensitive prodrug nanoparticle for combination therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Yumin Zhang; Cuihong Yang; Weiwei Wang; Jinjian Liu; Qiang Liu; Fan Huang; Liping Chu; Honglin Gao; Chen Li; Deling Kong; Qian Liu; Jianfeng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In vivo study of doxorubicin-loaded cell-penetrating peptide-modified pH-sensitive liposomes: biocompatibility, bio-distribution, and pharmacodynamics in BALB/c nude mice bearing human breast tumors.

Authors:  Yuan Ding; Wei Cui; Dan Sun; Gui-Ling Wang; Yu Hei; Shuai Meng; Jian-Hua Chen; Ying Xie; Zhi-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  LDH-stabilized ultrasmall iron oxide nanoparticles as a platform for hyaluronidase-promoted MR imaging and chemotherapy of tumors.

Authors:  Ni Zhang; Yue Wang; Changchang Zhang; Yu Fan; Du Li; Xueyan Cao; Jindong Xia; Xiangyang Shi; Rui Guo
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.