Literature DB >> 24715403

Collaborative hypertension case management by registered nurses and clinical pharmacy specialists within the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) model.

Jessica L O'Neill1, Tori L Cunningham, Wyndy L Wiitala, Emily P Bartley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPSs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) are integrally involved in the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) model, especially as physician extenders in the management of chronic disease states. CPSs may be an alternative to physicians as a supporting prescriber for RN case management (RNCM) of poorly controlled hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: To compare CPS-directed versus physician-directed RNCM for patients with poorly controlled hypertension.
DESIGN: Non-randomized, retrospective comparison of a natural experiment.
SETTING: A large Midwestern Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. INTERVENTION: Utilizing CPSs as alternatives to physicians for directing RNCM of poorly controlled hypertension. PATIENTS: All 126 patients attended RNCM appointments for poorly controlled hypertension between 20 September 2011 and 31 October 2011 with either CPS or physician involvement in the clinical decision making. Patients were excluded if both a CPS and a physician were involved in the index visit, or they were enrolled in Home Based Primary Care, or if they displayed non-adherence to the plan. MAIN MEASURES: All data were obtained from review of electronic medical records. Outcomes included whether a patient received medication intensification at the index visit, and as the main measure, blood pressures between the index and next consecutive visit. KEY
RESULTS: All patients had medication intensification. Patients receiving CPS-directed RNCM had greater decreases in systolic blood pressure compared to those receiving physician-directed RNCM (14 ± 13 mmHg versus 10 ± 11 mmHg; p = 0.04). After adjusting for the time between visits, initial systolic blood pressure, and prior stroke, provider type was no longer significant (p = 0.24). Change in diastolic blood pressure and attainment of blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg were similar between groups (p = 0.93, p = 0.91, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: CPS-directed and physician-directed RNCM for hypertension demonstrated similar blood pressure reduction. These results support the utilization of CPSs as prescribers to support RNCM for chronic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715403      PMCID: PMC4070225          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2774-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  Proactive case management of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by a clinical pharmacist: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hae Mi Choe; Sonya Mitrovich; Daniel Dubay; Rodney A Hayward; Sarah L Krein; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Knut Schroeder; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Nurse diabetes case management interventions and blood glucose control: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garry Welch; Jane Garb; Sofija Zagarins; Irina Lendel; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Nurse case management to improve risk reduction outcomes in a stroke prevention clinic.

Authors:  Sandra Ireland; Gail MacKenzie; Linda Gould; Diane Dassinger; Alicja Koper; Kathryn LeBlanc
Journal:  Can J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2010

5.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Edward H Wagner; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley A Stevens; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Stephen Hendriksen; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Andrea J Cook; James D Ralston; Paul A Fishman; Sheryl L Catz; James Carlson; David Carrell; Lynda Tyll; Eric B Larson; Robert S Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Clinical impact of a pharmacist-managed diabetes mellitus drug therapy management service.

Authors:  Amie D McCord
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Effect of nurse case management compared with usual care on controlling cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Areef Ishani; Nancy Greer; Brent C Taylor; Laurie Kubes; Paula Cole; Melissa Atwood; Barbara Clothier; Nacide Ercan-Fang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of registered nurses on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Lukewich; Ruth Martin-Misener; Allison A Norful; Marie-Eve Poitras; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Shabnam Asghari; Emily Gard Marshall; Maria Mathews; Michelle Swab; Dana Ryan; Joan Tranmer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Community-Based Advanced Case Management for Patients with Complex Multimorbidity and High Medical Dependence: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Kana Kazawa; Michiko Moriyama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Home-based interventions for black patients with uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Penny H Feldman; Margaret V McDonald; Yolanda Barrón; Linda M Gerber; Timothy R Peng
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  The effect of collaborative care model training on diabetic foot ulcer patients' quality of life: a semi-experimental study.

Authors:  Nader Aghakhani; Rahim Baghaei; Rasoul Sadeghi; Rahim Nejad Rahim; Masoumeh Akbari
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-11-17

5.  A coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's community hypertension care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Wei-Yi Fang; Fu Zhu; Hong-Guang Zhang; Kai Liu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Effectiveness of registered nurses on system outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Lukewich; Shabnam Asghari; Emily Gard Marshall; Maria Mathews; Michelle Swab; Joan Tranmer; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Ruth Martin-Misener; Allison A Norful; Dana Ryan; Marie-Eve Poitras
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Population-Tailored Care for Homeless Veterans and Acute Care Use, Cost, and Satisfaction: A Prospective Quasi-Experimental Trial.

Authors:  Thomas P O'Toole; Erin E Johnson; Matthew Borgia; Amy Noack; Jean Yoon; Elizabeth Gehlert; Jeanie Lo
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  An integrated program with home blood-pressure monitoring and village health volunteers for treating poorly controlled hypertension at the primary care level in an urban community of Thailand.

Authors:  Sawitree Visanuyothin; Samlee Plianbangchang; Ratana Somrongthong
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2018-04-18

9.  The Effect of Collaborative Care Model-Based Intervention on Hope in Caregivers and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mahnaz Rakhshan; Somayeh Ganjalivand; Ladan Zarshenas; Nastran Majdinasab
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2018-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.