BACKGROUND: When vasospasm is detected after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), it is treated with hypertensive or endovascular therapy. Current classification methods are resource-intensive, relying on specialty-trained professionals (nursing exams, transcranial dopplers, and perfusion imaging). More passively obtained variables such as cerebrospinal fluid drainage volumes, sodium, glucose, blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and heart rate, have not been used to predict vasospasm. We hypothesize that these features may yield as much information as resource-intensive features to classify vasospasm. METHODS: We studied data from 81 aSAH patients presenting within two days of onset. Vasospasm class (VSP) was defined by angiographic vasospasm warranting endovascular treatment. Naïve Bayes (NB) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers were trained on selected variable feature sets from the first three days of illness. Performance of trained classifiers was evaluated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC classifier) and F-measure (F classifier). Ablation analysis determined incremental utility of each variable and subsets. RESULTS: 43.2 % developed VSP. During feature selection, the only passively collected variable that did not yield a statistically significant summary statistic was CSF drainage volume. NB classifier trained on all passively obtained features (AUC NB 0.708 and F NB 0.636) outperformed NB classifier trained on resource-intensive features (AUC NB 0.501 and F NB 0.349). CONCLUSIONS: Data-driven analysis of passively obtained clinical data predicted VSP better than current targeted resource-intensive monitoring techniques after aSAH. Automated classification of VSP may be possible.
BACKGROUND: When vasospasm is detected after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), it is treated with hypertensive or endovascular therapy. Current classification methods are resource-intensive, relying on specialty-trained professionals (nursing exams, transcranial dopplers, and perfusion imaging). More passively obtained variables such as cerebrospinal fluid drainage volumes, sodium, glucose, blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and heart rate, have not been used to predict vasospasm. We hypothesize that these features may yield as much information as resource-intensive features to classify vasospasm. METHODS: We studied data from 81 aSAH patients presenting within two days of onset. Vasospasm class (VSP) was defined by angiographic vasospasm warranting endovascular treatment. Naïve Bayes (NB) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers were trained on selected variable feature sets from the first three days of illness. Performance of trained classifiers was evaluated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC classifier) and F-measure (F classifier). Ablation analysis determined incremental utility of each variable and subsets. RESULTS: 43.2 % developed VSP. During feature selection, the only passively collected variable that did not yield a statistically significant summary statistic was CSF drainage volume. NB classifier trained on all passively obtained features (AUC NB 0.708 and F NB 0.636) outperformed NB classifier trained on resource-intensive features (AUC NB 0.501 and F NB 0.349). CONCLUSIONS: Data-driven analysis of passively obtained clinical data predicted VSP better than current targeted resource-intensive monitoring techniques after aSAH. Automated classification of VSP may be possible.
Authors: Joshua B Bederson; E Sander Connolly; H Hunt Batjer; Ralph G Dacey; Jacques E Dion; Michael N Diringer; John E Duldner; Robert E Harbaugh; Aman B Patel; Robert H Rosenwasser Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M R Mayberg; H H Batjer; R Dacey; M Diringer; E C Haley; R C Heros; L L Sternau; J Torner; H P Adams; W Feinberg Journal: Stroke Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Y B Roos; R J de Haan; L F Beenen; R J Groen; K W Albrecht; M Vermeulen Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Mervyn D I Vergouwen; Marinus Vermeulen; Jan van Gijn; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Eelco F Wijdicks; J Paul Muizelaar; A David Mendelow; Seppo Juvela; Howard Yonas; Karel G Terbrugge; R Loch Macdonald; Michael N Diringer; Joseph P Broderick; Jens P Dreier; Yvo B W E M Roos Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M A Sloan; A V Alexandrov; C H Tegeler; M P Spencer; L R Caplan; E Feldmann; L R Wechsler; D W Newell; C R Gomez; V L Babikian; D Lefkowitz; R S Goldman; C Armon; C Y Hsu; D S Goodin Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-05-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Murad Megjhani; Miriam Weiss; Soon Bin Kwon; Jenna Ford; Daniel Nametz; Nick Kastenholz; Hart Fogel; Angela Velazquez; David Roh; Sachin Agarwal; E Sander Connolly; Jan Claassen; Gerrit A Schubert; Soojin Park Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Murad Megjhani; Farhad Kaffashi; Kalijah Terilli; Ayham Alkhachroum; Behnaz Esmaeili; Kevin William Doyle; Santosh Murthy; Angela G Velazquez; E Sander Connolly; David Jinou Roh; Sachin Agarwal; Ken A Loparo; Jan Claassen; Amelia Boehme; Soojin Park Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jude P J Savarraj; Georgene W Hergenroeder; Liang Zhu; Tiffany Chang; Soojin Park; Murad Megjhani; Farhaan S Vahidy; Zhongming Zhao; Ryan S Kitagawa; H Alex Choi Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Murad Megjhani; Kalijah Terilli; Hans-Peter Frey; Angela G Velazquez; Kevin William Doyle; Edward Sander Connolly; David Jinou Roh; Sachin Agarwal; Jan Claassen; Noemie Elhadad; Soojin Park Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 4.003