Literature DB >> 24715106

BRAF V600E mutations are characteristic for papillary craniopharyngioma and may coexist with CTNNB1-mutated adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.

Sarah Jane Larkin1, Veronica Preda, Niki Karavitaki, Ashley Grossman, Olaf Ansorge.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715106      PMCID: PMC4024131          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1270-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


× No keyword cloud information.
Craniopharyngiomas are epithelial, sellar tumours comprising two subtypes: adamantinomatous (aCP) and papillary (pCP). aCPs contain mutations in CTNNB1, encoding β-catenin: a component of the adherens junction and mediator of Wnt signalling. Reported frequency of CTNNB1 mutations varies widely (16–100 %) [6, 7]. Recently, it was reported that pCPs contain BRAF p.V600E mutations in 95 % of cases [2] and that CTNNB1 and BRAF mutations are mutually exclusive and specific to tumour subtype. We examined the relationship between mutation in CTNNB1 and BRAF and subcellular location of β-catenin in a series of 37 craniopharyngiomas. The region of BRAF exon 15 containing codon 600 was sequenced, as was exon 3 of CTNNB1. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for β-catenin was used to examine its subcellular location and an antibody specific for the BRAF V600E mutation (clone VE1) was used to complement the sequencing findings in all aCP and pCPs. Methods are reported in Online Resource 1. We found BRAF V600E mutations in 81 % (17 of 21) pCPs by targeted Sanger sequencing and in 86 % (18 of 21) pCPs by IHC. Although there was agreement between methods in 95 % (20 out of 21) of cases, interpretation of anti-BRAF V600E staining was challenging due to occasional non-specific reactivity. aCP cases were selected for the study on the basis of their CTNNB1 mutation status [6 wild type and 10 mutant (9 T41I, 1 D32N)]. In all aCPs, translocation of β-catenin from membrane to cytosol/nucleus was observed, confirming the utility of β-catenin translocation as a diagnostic tool. Of 16 aCP cases, 14 (88 %) were BRAF wild type by sequencing and IHC. We observed BRAF V600E mutation in two aCP cases. This finding was validated by careful diagnostic review of morphology and comparison with IHC findings. Further validation was obtained by sequencing in forward and reverse directions from two DNA samples extracted on different occasions. In both these specimens, CTNNB1 mutation was also present (T41I) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

BRAF V600E mutations in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Two cases are shown (a–e and f–j). a, f Classical features of aCP (wet keratin, stellate reticulum, palisaded epithelium). b, g Translocation of β-catenin is shown in both cases (brown reaction product). c, h An antibody to BRAF V600E (VE1) shows staining of the tumour tissue (brown reaction product). d, i V600E mutations are seen in BRAF. e, j T41I mutations are seen in CTNNB1. All scale bars 100 μm

BRAF V600E mutations in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Two cases are shown (a–e and f–j). a, f Classical features of aCP (wet keratin, stellate reticulum, palisaded epithelium). b, g Translocation of β-catenin is shown in both cases (brown reaction product). c, h An antibody to BRAF V600E (VE1) shows staining of the tumour tissue (brown reaction product). d, i V600E mutations are seen in BRAF. e, j T41I mutations are seen in CTNNB1. All scale bars 100 μm Sequencing of bulk tumour revealed no relationship between CTNNB1 mutation and cytosolic/nuclear accumulation of β-catenin. However, our study did not search for mutations at other loci, which could have led to an under-estimation of the proportion of specimens harbouring CTNNB1 mutations. In other studies on FFPE tissue that used Sanger dideoxy sequencing to search for CTNNB1 mutation, the rate was also not 100 % [3, 5, 7], suggesting that this method is not sufficiently sensitive to detect the presence of a mutation in all samples. In contrast, Brastianos et al. [2] found CTNNB1 mutations in 96 % of aCPs using mass spectrometric genotyping. We found BRAF V600E mutations in 81 % of pCPs. Difficulties interpreting BRAF V600E staining have been reported previously and suggest that in specimens with a significant amount of epithelium, sequencing may be more reliable for determining mutational status of BRAF [1, 8]. A mutation in BRAF was found in two aCP cases, both of which had a coexisting CTNNB1 mutation, demonstrating that although the majority of aCPs do not contain BRAF mutations, they are not exclusive to pCPs and can exist with mutations in CTNNB1. In the majority of cases, however, mutations segregate with tumour subtype: CTNNB1 in aCPs and BRAF in pCPs. While inhibition of the Wnt pathway has proved challenging and effective inhibitors are still largely in development, inhibitors of mutant BRAF have shown efficacy as chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of melanoma [4]. The finding that BRAF V600E is mutated in the majority of pCPs offers the possibility for targeted BRAF-inhibitor therapy for patients with this tumour type. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 213 kb)
  8 in total

1.  Craniopharyngiomas of adamantinomatous type harbor beta-catenin gene mutations.

Authors:  Shigeki Sekine; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Akiko Kokubu; Yukio Morishita; Masayuki Noguchi; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Michiie Sakamoto; Setsuo Hirohashi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  VE1 immunohistochemistry in pituitary adenomas is not associated with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Jan Sperveslage; Midea Gierke; David Capper; Jürgen Honegger; Bence Sipos; Rudi Beschorner; Jens Schittenhelm
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Igor Puzanov; Kevin B Kim; Antoni Ribas; Grant A McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Peter J O'Dwyer; Richard J Lee; Joseph F Grippo; Keith Nolop; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Common mutations of beta-catenin in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas but not in other tumours originating from the sellar region.

Authors:  Rolf Buslei; Michael Nolde; Bernd Hofmann; Stephan Meissner; Ilker Y Eyupoglu; Florian Siebzehnrübl; Eric Hahnen; Jürgen Kreutzer; Rudolf Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Beta-catenin mutations in craniopharyngiomas and pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Eftychia Oikonomou; Diele C Barreto; Beatriz Soares; Luiz De Marco; Michael Buchfelder; Eric F Adams
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Possible linkage between specific histological structures and aberrant reactivation of the Wnt pathway in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Keisuke Kato; Yukio Nakatani; Hiroshi Kanno; Yoshiyuki Inayama; Rieko Ijiri; Noriyuki Nagahara; Tetsumi Miyake; Mio Tanaka; Yumi Ito; Noriko Aida; Katsuhiko Tachibana; Ken-ichi Sekido; Yukichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cheryl A Adackapara; Lynette M Sholl; Justine A Barletta; Jason L Hornick
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Priscilla K Brastianos; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Peter E Manley; Robert T Jones; Dora Dias-Santagata; Aaron R Thorner; Michael S Lawrence; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lindsay A Bernardo; Laura Schubert; Ashwini Sunkavalli; Nick Shillingford; Monica L Calicchio; Hart G W Lidov; Hala Taha; Maria Martinez-Lage; Mariarita Santi; Phillip B Storm; John Y K Lee; James N Palmer; Nithin D Adappa; R Michael Scott; Ian F Dunn; Edward R Laws; Chip Stewart; Keith L Ligon; Mai P Hoang; Paul Van Hummelen; William C Hahn; David N Louis; Adam C Resnick; Mark W Kieran; Gad Getz; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 38.330

  8 in total
  32 in total

Review 1.  Can tissue biomarkers reliably predict the biological behavior of craniopharyngiomas? A comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Ruth Prieto; José M Pascual
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  [New aspects of tumor pathology of the pituitary].

Authors:  W Saeger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Study of β-catenin and BRAF alterations in adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas: mutation analysis with immunohistochemical correlation in 54 cases.

Authors:  Prit Benny Malgulwar; Aruna Nambirajan; Pankaj Pathak; Mohammed Faruq; Vaishali Suri; Chitra Sarkar; Amandeep Jagdevan; Bhawani Shankar Sharma; Mehar Chand Sharma
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Histopathology and molecular characterisation of intrauterine-diagnosed congenital craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Valeria Scagliotti; Laura Avagliano; Angelica Gualtieri; Federica Graziola; Patrizia Doi; Jane Chalker; Andrea Righini; Marta Korbonits; Gaetano Bulfamante; Thomas S Jacques; Valentina Massa; Carles Gaston-Massuet
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Genomic Alterations in Sporadic Pituitary Tumors.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Alexandra Giantini Larsen; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Genetic Testing in Endocrinology.

Authors:  Sunita Mc De Sousa; Tristan Se Hardy; Hamish S Scott; David J Torpy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2018-02

7.  Distinct patterns of primary and motile cilia in Rathke's cleft cysts and craniopharyngioma subtypes.

Authors:  Shannon Coy; Ziming Du; Shu-Hsien Sheu; Terri Woo; Fausto J Rodriguez; Mark W Kieran; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Immunohistochemistry or Molecular Analysis: Which Method Is Better for Subtyping Craniopharyngioma?

Authors:  Noriaki Fukuhara; Takeo Iwata; Naoko Inoshita; Katsuhiko Yoshimoto; Masanobu Kitagawa; Hirokazu Fukuhara; Keita Tatsushima; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Akira Takeshita; Junko Ito; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Shozo Yamada; Hiroshi Nishioka
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 9.  ENDOCRINE TUMORS: BRAF V600E mutations in papillary craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Priscilla K Brastianos; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.664

10.  BRAF V600E mutant papillary craniopharyngiomas: a single-institutional case series.

Authors:  Emanuele La Corte; Iyan Younus; Francesca Pivari; Adelina Selimi; Malte Ottenhausen; Jonathan A Forbes; David J Pisapia; Georgiana A Dobri; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.