| Literature DB >> 24714729 |
Yuan Liang1, Yu Sun1, Xiaolei Li2, Lianqi Yan2, Jingcheng Wang2, Jinlong Hu2, Huan Yu2, Haixiang Xiao2, Hui Chen2, Zhongwei Sun2, Jun Cai2, Xinmin Feng2, Chuanzhi Xiong2, Jinshan He2.
Abstract
10-Hydroxycamptothecin could reduce intraarticular adhesion by inhibiting fibroblasts proliferation after knee surgery. However, the ideal concentration of hydroxycamptothecin have not been defined. This study was tried to verify the optimal concentration of 10-hydroxycamptothecin in preventing knee intraarticular adhesion. Sixty rabbits were randomly divided into five groups. Approximately 10 mm × 10 mm of the cortical bone was removed from both sides of the femoral condyle and the underneath cancellous bone was exposed. Various concentrations of hydroxycamptothecin (0.1 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 1.0 mg/ml, 2.0 mg/ml) or saline were applied to the decorticated areas for 10 minutes. After four weeks, the degree of inraarticular adhesion was assessed by macroscopic evaluation, biochemical analysis of hydroxyproline content and histological evaluation. The results demonstrated that the extent of knee inraarticular adhesion in 1.0 mg/ml group and 2.0 mg/ml hydroxycamptothecin group were significantly lower than those of 0.5 mg/ml group, 0.1 mg/ml hydroxycamptothecin group and control group. Moreover, there was no significant difference between 1.0 mg/ml group and 2.0 mg/ml hydroxycamptothecin group. In conclusion, topical application of 1.0 mg/ml hydroxycamptothecin may be the optimal concentration in reducing intraarticular adhesion after knee surgery in rabbits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24714729 PMCID: PMC3980220 DOI: 10.1038/srep04621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The degree of intraarticular adhesion according to the visual scoring system
| Grade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| control | 6 | |||
| HCPT (0.1 mg/ml) | 2 | 4 | ||
| HCPT (0.5 mg/mL) | 1 | 4 | 1 | |
| HCPT (1.0 mg/mL) | 3 | 3 | ||
| HCPT (2.0 mg/mL) | 4 | 2 | ||
Six rabbits were selected from each group. The values within the table represent the number of rabbits.
The result of One-Way ANOVA as follows
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Groups | 4299.2 | 4 | 1074.8 | 253.093 | 0.000 |
| Within Groups | 106.167 | 25 | 4.247 | ||
| Total | 4405.367 | 29 |
Figure 1Hydroxyproline contents in intraarticular scar tissue in HCTP-treated groups and control group.
Hydroxyproline content was expressed as μg/mg. *p < 0.05, compared with the hydroxyproline content in control group. #p < 0.05, compared with the hydroxyproline content in 2.0 mg/ml group and 1.0 mg/ml HCPT group.
Figure 2Histological view of the intraarticular adhesion issues in the decorticated areas treated with HCPT (2.0 mg/ml, 1.0 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml) and saline.
Note that the loose scar tissues were found in the decorticated areas treated with 1.0 mg/ml group and 2.0 mg/ml HCPT group. Dense scar tissue was found in the decorticated areas treated with saline. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin(200×).
Figure 3The collagen density of intararticular adhesion tissue in HCPT-treated groups and control group.
The collagen tissues show blue in the section with Masson's trichrome staining under the light microscope(200×). HCPT could reduce collagen synthesis and fibrosis. The density of collagen tissue in 1.0 and 2.0 mg/ml HCPT-treated groups revealed significant decrease compared with those in 0.5 mg/ml HCPT group, 0.1 mg/ml HCPT group and control group.