Literature DB >> 24714248

The role of probiotics in pouchitis Georgios Nalmpantidis, Theofanis Maris.

Georgios Nalmpantidis1, Thessaloniki Maris1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24714248      PMCID: PMC3959424     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1108-7471


× No keyword cloud information.
In their invited narrative review article, Gionchetti et al (April-June issue) [1] report 6 studies in which probiotics were used for maintenance of remission in pouchitis or induction of remission in acute pouchitis. In all but one studies VSL#3 probiotic was used. In 4 studies treatment group (VSL#3 regi-men was used in 3 studies) was compared to a control group [2-5]. [Q1. references are missing]. The studies of VSL#3 may form a coherent group, although the duration of treatment varied between 9 and 12 months. A recent meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases synthesized data of 4 studies of pouchitis treatment [6]. In this systematic review the relative risk ratio for the probiotic group was 0.17 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.10-0.30]. However, most of the studies cited by the article of Gionchetti et al were not included in this meta-analysis. The heterogeneity among the 3 probiotic-control studies referred by Gionchetti et al is not statistically significant (Cochrane’s Q for Odds Ratio, Risk Ratio and Risk Difference is 3.435, 0.040 and 4.730, with 2 degrees of freedom, and P value of 0.178, 0.980 and 0.094, respectively). Using a fixed-effect meta-analysis model (NCSS 2007 software) the combined Odds Ratio for the disease is 0.036 (95% CI 0.011-0.113), the Risk Ratio for the disease is 0.182 (95% CI 0.100-0.328) and Risk Difference is -0.718 (95% CI -0.835 - -0.602) in favor of the probiotic group (Fig. 1). These results are in accordance with the findings of the systematic review [6]. Statistically significant heterogeneity will be detected if the study of Kuisma (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG was used for 3 months) is included in the meta-analysis model.
Figure 1

Forest plot of Risk Ratio of pouchitis in patients receiving VSL#3

Forest plot of Risk Ratio of pouchitis in patients receiving VSL#3 It is of interest that a case report of 2 patients suggested that another type of probiotic, Escherichia coli Nissle 917, might be beneficial for the treatment of active pouchitis and for maintenance therapy [7]. The results of small clinical trials and anecdotal reports indicate the urgent need for large-scale, randomized, placebo-control trials.
  7 in total

1.  Induction and maintenance of remission with nonpathogenic Escherichia coli in patients with pouchitis.

Authors:  L Kuzela; M Kascak; A Vavrecka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  P Gionchetti; F Rizzello; A Venturi; P Brigidi; D Matteuzzi; G Bazzocchi; G Poggioli; M Miglioli; M Campieri
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora.

Authors:  J Kuisma; S Mentula; H Jarvinen; A Kahri; M Saxelin; M Farkkila
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis.

Authors:  T Mimura; F Rizzello; U Helwig; G Poggioli; S Schreiber; I C Talbot; R J Nicholls; P Gionchetti; M Campieri; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Paolo Gionchetti; Fernando Rizzello; Ulf Helwig; Alessandro Venturi; Karen Manon Lammers; Patrizia Brigidi; Beatrice Vitali; Gilberto Poggioli; Mario Miglioli; Massimo Campieri
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  A meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  Marina L Ritchie; Tamara N Romanuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The role of antibiotics and probiotics in pouchitis.

Authors:  Paolo Gionchetti; Andrea Calafiore; Donatella Riso; Giuseppina Liguori; Carlo Calabrese; Giulia Vitali; Silvio Laureti; Gilberto Poggioli; Massimo Campieri; Fernando Rizzello
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.