Literature DB >> 24714195

Hemostatic bitherapy for spurting bleeding.

Konstantinos H Katsanos1, Dimitrios E Sigounas1, Dimitrios K Christodoulou1, Epameinondas V Tsianos1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24714195      PMCID: PMC3959371     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1108-7471


× No keyword cloud information.
Endoscopic clipping is an easy and effective technique for the treatment of various bleeding lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Several studies have shown comparable efficacy between clipping and contact thermal therapy for hemostasis of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Proficiency in clip application and endoscopic identification of lesions that are amenable to clipping are basic determinants of successful hemostasis [1]. In recent years, endoscopic hemostatic bitherapy (adrenaline injection plus clipping or bipolar coagulation) replaced monotherapy with injection of adrenaline for hemostasis [2]. The patient presented herein was scoped on emergency due to massive hematemesis. Patient had a history of Billroth type II operation 20 years ago and no obvious triggering factor for this acute bleeding. On endoscopy a blood jet was identified at the gastrointestinal anastomosis. The bleeding jet was successfully treated with adrenaline injection and clipping (Fig. 1) and the patient recovered smoothly with no need of further intervention.
Figure 1

Spurting bleeding (A) and hemostatic bitherapy (B) in a gastroenteric anastomosis

Spurting bleeding (A) and hemostatic bitherapy (B) in a gastroenteric anastomosis In spurting bleedings clinical experience shows that multiple clips are frequently necessary and hemostasis may require up to 6 clips for each bleeding location. Various types of hemostatic clips are available. In a study with a reloadable clipping device, on average 5 clips (range 1-6) were used. Sequential application of multiple hemoclips had an increasing effect. Of interest, the number of hemoclips applied correlated inversely, but not significantly, with the endoscopist´s experience [3]. A meta-analysis of more than 1,000 patients in 15 studies showed that successful application of hemoclips is superior to injection alone but comparable to thermocoagulation in producing definitive hemostasis. There was no difference in all-cause mortality irrespective of the modalities of endoscopic treatment [4].
  4 in total

1.  Peptic upper gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnosis and treatment. A monocentric experience on a 5 years period.

Authors:  I Sporea; Daniela Lazăr; Alina Popescu; Roxana Sirli; A Goldiş; M Străin; Adriana Tudora; Mirela Dănilă; V Dănilă; Corina Vernic
Journal:  Rom J Intern Med       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph J Y Sung; Kelvin K F Tsoi; Larry H Lai; Justin C Y Wu; James Y W Lau
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Endoscopic clipping for the management of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Constantinos P Anastassiades; Todd H Baron; Louis M Wong Kee Song
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-08-19

4.  Hemodynamic efficacy of sequential hemoclip application using the Olympus HX-110/610 reloadable clipping device in spurting bleedings.

Authors:  Anke Ende; Yurdaguel Zopf; Roland Heide; Thomas Bernatik; Markus Wehler; Dieter Schwab; Eckhart G Hahn; Juergen Maiss
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.