Literature DB >> 24714047

Preferences for autonomy in end-of-life decision making in modern Korean society.

Su Hyun Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The demand for autonomy in medical decision making is increasing among Korean people, but it is not well known why some people prefer autonomy in decision making but others do not. RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which Korean adults wished to exercise autonomy in the process of decision making regarding end-of-life treatment and to determine whether economic issues and family functioning, in particular, were associated with preferences for participation in decision making in Korean people. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional correlational study using a survey. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Data were collected using structured questionnaires from 354 patients or their families who visited ambulatory departments at two general hospitals in South Korea, recruited by the proportionate quota sampling method. Data analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression analyses. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the hospitals' directors and the ethics committee of Kyungpook National University Hospital. Written informed consent was given by all participants.
FINDINGS: A majority of Korean people wanted to make autonomous decisions regarding treatment at the end of life. Preferences for autonomous decision making regarding end-of-life treatment, rather than relying on family, showed a significant increase in association with poor family functioning and low income. DISCUSSION: Results of this study suggested the necessity for development of alternatives to a dominant traditional "family-centered" approach in Korean people, in order to enhance end-of-life decision making for people who wish to take an active role in the decision-making process.
CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers need to examine not only patients' preferred decision-making style but also any reasons for their choice, in particular, family conflict and financial burden.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture; decision making; personal autonomy; terminal care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24714047     DOI: 10.1177/0969733014523168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  3 in total

1.  The Role of Patients' Families in Cancer Treatment Decision-Making: Perspectives among Eastern and Western families.

Authors:  Abdulrahim Al-Bahri; Mansour Al-Moundhri; Mohammed Al-Azri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2018-01-10

2.  End-of-Life Decision Making in Palliative Care and Recommendations of the Council of Europe: Qualitative Secondary Analysis of Interviews and Observation Field Notes.

Authors:  Sandra Martins Pereira; Emília Fradique; Pablo Hernández-Marrero
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Shin Hye Yoo; Wonho Choi; Yejin Kim; Min Sun Kim; Hye Yoon Park; Bhumsuk Keam; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.679

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.