| Literature DB >> 24712862 |
A Rhodin1, M von Ehren, B Skottheim, A Grönbladh, F Ortiz-Nieto, R Raininko, T Gordh, F Nyberg.
Abstract
During recent decades, the increasing use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain has raised concerns regarding tolerance, addiction, and importantly cognitive dysfunction. Current research suggests that the somatotrophic axis could play an important role in cognitive function. Administration of growth hormone (GH) to GH-deficient humans and experimental animals has been shown to result in significant improvements in cognitive capacity. In this report, a patient with cognitive disabilities resulting from chronic treatment with opioids for neuropathic pain received recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement therapy. A 61-year-old man presented with severe cognitive dysfunction after long-term methadone treatment for intercostal neuralgia and was diagnosed with GH insufficiency by GH releasing hormone-arginine testing. The effect of rhGH replacement therapy on his cognitive capacity and quality of life was investigated. The hippocampal volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and the ratios of the major metabolites were calculated using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cognitive testing revealed significant improvements in visuospatial cognitive function after rhGH. The hippocampal volume remained unchanged. In the right hippocampus, the N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio (reflecting nerve cell function) was initially low but increased significantly during rhGH treatment, as did subjective cognitive, physical and emotional functioning. This case report indicates that rhGH replacement therapy could improve cognitive behaviour and well-being, as well as hippocampal metabolism and functioning in opioid-treated patients with chronic pain. The idea that GH could affect brain function and repair disabilities induced by long-term exposure to opioid analgesia is supported.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24712862 PMCID: PMC4265204 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ISSN: 0001-5172 Impact factor: 2.105
Fig 1Time schedule of the examinations and the patient' h rhGH. Cognitive testing; • MR examination; ▽ Quality of life and symptom evaluation with EORTC-QLQ; ----- Upper and lower limits of the normal range (2 SD variation); ____ Statistical mean of the normal range. Low dose 0,1–0,2 mg rhGH sc daily; effective dose 0,3 mg rhGH sc daily. IGF-1, insulin growth-like factor-1; rhGH, recombinant human growth hormone; MR, magnetic resonance; EORTC-QLQ, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation.
Fig 2Cognitive tests. Reyes Complex Fig. Test scores at baseline (base test), after 6 months of low-dose treatment (I) and after 6 months of effective rhGH treatment resulting in IGF-1 levels above the normal mean (II). ------ Normal range of variation; Statistical mean of the normal range. rhGH, recombinant human growth hormone; IGF-1, insulin growth-like factor-1.
Fig 3Quality of life and symptoms tested with the EORTC-QLQ form. For symptoms, a low value equates to a low intensity; for function, a low value equates to a low level of functioning. EORTC-QLQ, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.
Metabolite measurements; percentage change in the follow-up examinations compared with the baseline examination
| Right hippocampal region | Left hippocampal region | Estimated significant change | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up I | Follow-up II | Follow-up I | Follow-up II | ||
| Choline/creatine | +12% | −8% | −13% | ± 20% | |
| NAA/creatine | −3% | −8% | −21% | ± 30% | |
| Myoinositol/creatine | +10% | −1% | −5% | −13% | ± 30% |
Bold numbers indicate significant changes.
Based on the variations in the repeated examinations of the healthy controls.
NAA, N-acetyl aspartate.
Variation of metabolite ratios in repeated examinations of the controls
| Metabolite ratio | Change in repeated examinations (%) | Change estimated not to be method-related (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Control 1 | Control 2 | Control 3 | Control 4 | ||||||
| Mean ± SD, range | Mean ± SD, range | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | ||
| Cho/Cr | 0.31 ± 0.03, 0.28–0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.02, 0.32–0.35 | +17 | +13 | −7 | +13 | +9 | +11 | −4 | +4 | ± 25 |
| NAA/Cr | 1.18 ± 0.08, 1.11–1.29 | 1.30 ± 0.08 1.22–1.38 | +21 | −24 | −7 | −8 | +5 | +11 | +8 | +15 | ± 35 |
| Ins/Cr | 0.91 ± 0.06, 0.85–0.99 | 0.98 ± 0.07 0.93–1.06 | +4 | −9 | −22 | +12 | +0.3 | + 3 | +0.7 | +13 | ± 30 |
Ratios in the second examinations are compared with those in the first examination.
Cho, choline; Cr, creatine; NAA, N-acetyl aspartate; Ins, myoinositol; SD, standard deviation.
Changes of the metabolite ratios in the follow-up examinations of the patient compared with his baseline examination
| Metabolite ratio | Right hippocampal region | Left hippocampal region | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio in change (%) | Ration in change (%) | |||||
| Exam. I | Follow-up I | Follow-up II | Exam. I | Follow-up I | Follow-up II | |
| Cho/Cr | 0.30 | +12% | 0.40 | −8 % | −13% | |
| NAA /Cr | 0.79 | −3% | 1.31 | −8 % | −21% | |
| Ins/Cr | 0.91 | +10 % | −1 | 1.09 | −5 % | −13% |
Changes larger than method-related in bold type. Abbreviations as in Table 2.