Literature DB >> 24711957

Out of the bitter came forth sweet: Activating CD28-dependent co-stimulation via PD-1 ligands.

Chen Ankri1, Cyrille J Cohen1.   

Abstract

Programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1) is a central negative regulator of effector T cells that is involved in the etiology of chronic inflammatory conditions, viral diseases, and cancer. We have recently sought to improve T-cell functions by means of a novel chimeric co-stimulatory molecule that could divert the negative signals normally transmitted by PD-1 into positive ones. Human T cells transduced to express a fusion protein encompassing the extracellular domain of PD-1 and the intracellular portion of the co-stimulatory molecule CD28, which we named PD-1/28, exhibited an increase in cytokine secretion, the upregulation of activation markers, an improved proliferative potential and superior antineoplastic activity in xenograft models of human melanoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adoptive T cell transfer; CD28; PD1; T-cell engineering; immunotherapy

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711957      PMCID: PMC3976982          DOI: 10.4161/onci.27399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Inhibitory (or negative) co-stimulatory molecules such as programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) have been shown to actively modulate T-cell responses upon activation. Interestingly, they have also been implicated in the escape of malignant cells from immunosurveillance, as the signal they convey can impair T-cell functions, often leading to exhaustion, decreased secretion of multiple cytokines including interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), dampened proliferation and limited cytotoxic activity. PD-1, which is expressed on effector T cells shortly after T-cell receptor (TCR)-dependent activation, can negatively regulate T-cell function by itself. PD-1 binds to 2 different ligands, CD274 (best known as PD-L1 or B7-H1) and PD-1 ligand 2 (PDL2, also known as B7-DC), that can be expressed by professional antigen-presenting cells as well as by tumor cells of distinct histological origin (e.g., breast, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, bladder, and gastric cancer cells). Because of its critical immunosuppressive role, PD-1 has been extensively studied and therapeutic approaches aimed at eliminating its negative impact on T cell-dependent antitumor responses have been devised, mostly based on the blockade of PD-1 signaling with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. These agents can reverse T-cell exhaustion ex vivo and in vivo, hence inducing durable tumor regressions or prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced cancers. In contrast to PD-1, several co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD28, provide positive signals that are required for the full activation and effector activity of naïve T cells. Upon binding to their cognate ligands, these receptors—which belong to either the B7/CD28 family or the TNFα receptor (TNFR) family—convey TCR-independent intracellular signals that can lead to T-cell expansion as well as to the acquisition of effector functions. Thus, the balance between co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signals regulate the response, function and expansion of T cells in multiple pathophysiological scenario. The adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or genetically engineered T cells has received increasing attention over the past decade as this approach appears to mediate impressive tumor regressions in some patients bearing advanced neoplasms. In addition to receptors that endow T cells with a new specificity (including TCRs and so-called chimeric antigen receptors, CARs), co-stimulatory receptors such as CD28 can be genetically introduced into T cells in order to enhance their effector functions, persistence and antitumor activity.- However, due to the paucity of some activatory ligands (e.g., B7 family members) and the overexpression of inhibitory ligands (such as PD-L1) in the tumor microenvironment, T cells expressing co-stimulatory receptors are expected to function inadequately within neoplastic lesions. To circumvent this issue and generate T cells that are supposed to exhibit robust effector functions in the tumor microenvironment, we designed and optimized a re-targeting molecule that we termed “co-stimulatory converter,” which comprises the extracellular domain of PD-1 fused to the signaling domains of CD28 and/or TNFR superfamily, member 9 (TNFRSF9, best known as 4–1BB). The rationale of this approach was to take advantage of the elevated levels of PD-L1 found on malignant cells to stimulate genetically-engineered T cells (Fig. 1). Moreover, to emulate clinical conditions, we designed a tripartite retroviral vector that encodes the α and β chains of a clinically-tested melan A (MLANA)-specific TCR (F4) as well as one of our chimeric receptors, the PD-1/28 molecule. Following transduction, we were able to achieve high levels of expression of both PD-1/28 and F4 TCR in primary human T cells. We then evaluated the function of human T cells co-expressing PD-1/28 and F4 exposed to different melanoma cell lines, and we found that PD-1/28-engineered human T-cells secreted high amounts of various cytokines (including IL-2, IFNγ and TNFα) and expressed increased levels of activation markers including CD25, CD69, and 4–1BB. PD-1/28-expressing T cells also manifested an improved proliferative response as compared with control cells. These observations prompted us to investigate the cytotoxic functions of PD-1/28-expressing T cells in 2 xenograft models of human melanoma. First, we took advantage of a system that we recently adopted for adoptive T-cell transfer studies, which that is based on the growth of human tumors on the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Following the intravenous transfer of PD-1/28-transduced T cells, we observed improved tumor regression as compared with control conditions, and we were able to detect by flow cytometry the accumulation of adoptively transferred T cells within neoplastic lesions. In addition, by using an immunodeficient mouse model, we demonstrate that PD-1/28-transduced T cells are highly efficient at delaying the growth of human melanoma in vivo.

Figure 1. PD-1/28, a chimeric co-stimulatory converter. PD-1/28 is composed of the extracellular domain of the co-inhibitory receptor programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1) and the intracellular domain of the co-stimulatory molecule CD28. Upon binding to PD-1 ligands expressed on the surface of cancer cells, PD-1/28 results in increased cytokine secretion, upregulation of T-cell activation markers, improved proliferative potential and superior antitumor activity in xenograft models of human melanoma.

Figure 1. PD-1/28, a chimeric co-stimulatory converter. PD-1/28 is composed of the extracellular domain of the co-inhibitory receptor programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1) and the intracellular domain of the co-stimulatory molecule CD28. Upon binding to PD-1 ligands expressed on the surface of cancer cells, PD-1/28 results in increased cytokine secretion, upregulation of T-cell activation markers, improved proliferative potential and superior antitumor activity in xenograft models of human melanoma. Using other co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory molecules for the generation of additional co-stimulatory converters is an attractive perspective. We believe that this type of strategy could be useful in circumstances in T cells undergo exhaustion owing to the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis, such as in the course of chronic viral diseases. As malignant cells that escape T-cell responses could be selected in vivo over time based on their high levels of PD-L1, co-stimulatory converters may be useful for reverting this situation, reducing immunosuppression and hence enabling a robust T cell-mediated antitumor response. In summary, our results suggest that the PD-1/28 co-stimulatory converter improves the antitumor activity of adoptively transferred antigen-specific T cells, resulting to tumor regression. We trust that our findings highlight the importance of manipulating co-stimulatory pathways for the improvement of T cell-based treatments using gene transfer approaches.
  10 in total

1.  Human T cells engineered to express a programmed death 1/28 costimulatory retargeting molecule display enhanced antitumor activity.

Authors:  Chen Ankri; Katerina Shamalov; Miryam Horovitz-Fried; Shmuel Mauer; Cyrille J Cohen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Positive conversion of negative signaling of CTLA4 potentiates antitumor efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy in murine tumor models.

Authors:  Jae Hun Shin; Hyung Bae Park; Yu Mi Oh; Dong Pyo Lim; Ji Eun Lee; Hae Hyun Seo; Sang Jin Lee; Hyeon Seok Eom; In-Hoo Kim; Seung Hoon Lee; Kyungho Choi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  T cell exhaustion.

Authors:  E John Wherry
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 4.  Genetically modulating T-cell function to target cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Merhavi-Shoham; Astar Haga-Friedman; Cyrille J Cohen
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 5.  Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response.

Authors:  Nicholas P Restifo; Mark E Dudley; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 6.  Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 7.  The complex role of B7 molecules in tumor immunology.

Authors:  Barbara Seliger; Francesco M Marincola; Soldano Ferrone; Hinrich Abken
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 8.  PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity.

Authors:  Mary E Keir; Manish J Butte; Gordon J Freeman; Arlene H Sharpe
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 28.527

9.  Enhanced antitumor activity mediated by human 4-1BB-engineered T cells.

Authors:  Inbal Daniel-Meshulam; Miryam Horovitz-Fried; Cyrille J Cohen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Restoration of CD28 expression in CD28- CD8+ memory effector T cells reconstitutes antigen-induced IL-2 production.

Authors:  Max S Topp; Stanley R Riddell; Yoshiki Akatsuka; Michael C Jensen; Joseph N Blattman; Philip D Greenberg
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  The advantages of PD1 activating chimeric receptor (PD1-ACR) engineered lymphocytes for PDL1(+) cancer therapy.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Qingguo Li; Yongqiang Zhu; Donghui Zheng; Jingjing Dai; Wenxuan Ni; Jia Wei; Yubao Xue; Ke Chen; Wei Hou; Chao Zhang; Xiaojun Feng; Yong Liang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Designing chimeric antigen receptors to effectively and safely target tumors.

Authors:  Michael C Jensen; Stanley R Riddell
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 3.  The Anticancer Potential of T Cell Receptor-Engineered T Cells.

Authors:  Matyas Ecsedi; Megan S McAfee; Aude G Chapuis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-09-26

Review 4.  Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Hillerdal; Magnus Essand
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  Targeting Multiple Tumors Using T-Cells Engineered to Express a Natural Cytotoxicity Receptor 2-Based Chimeric Receptor.

Authors:  Vasyl Eisenberg; Katerina Shamalov; Shimrit Meir; Shiran Hoogi; Rhitajit Sarkar; Shirel Pinker; Gal Markel; Angel Porgador; Cyrille J Cohen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Level of neo-epitope predecessor and mutation type determine T cell activation of MHC binding peptides.

Authors:  Hanan Besser; Sharon Yunger; Efrat Merhavi-Shoham; Cyrille J Cohen; Yoram Louzoun
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 7.  TCR-T Immunotherapy: The Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Yating Liu; Xin Yan; Fan Zhang; Xiaoxia Zhang; Futian Tang; Zhijian Han; Yumin Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.