Literature DB >> 24711636

Comparison of the impact of "fast decline" in residual renal function and "initial anuria" on long-term outcomes in CAPD patients.

Yi-Hua Lu1, Jyh-Chang Hwang2, Ming-Yan Jiang1, Charn-Ting Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual renal function (RRF) is pivotal to long-term outcomes, while rapid RRF decline (RRFD) is associated with mortality risk for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. This study was conducted to compare the impact of "initial anuria" and rapid RRFD on the long-term prognosis of CAPD patients.
METHOD: According to the timing of anuria and the slope of RRFD, a total of 255 incident CAPD patients were divided into 3 groups. For the "anuria" group, anuria was detected from CAPD initiation and persisted for > 6 months (n = 27). Based on the median of the RRFD slope, the other 228 non-anuric patients were divided into a "slow decliner" group (n = 114), and a "rapid decliner" group (n = 114). The maximal observation period was 120 months.
RESULTS: Logistic regression tests indicated that the "anuria" group was associated with previous hemodialysis > 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 8.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.12 - 23.28), and female (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09 - 0.90), while the "fast decliner" group with higher Davies co-morbidity scores (DCS) (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.08 - 2.14), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04 - 1.21), and male (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04 - 1.21). After adjusting for DCS, the "fast decliner" group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17 - 0.80) showed a better outcome than that of the "anuria" group (reference = 1). Both baseline RRF (β = -0.24; p < 0.001) and DCS (β = -3.76; p < 0.001) showed inverse linear correlations to the slope of RRFD. From the Cox proportional analyses, higher baseline RRF (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88 -.97) and higher slope of RRFD (slower decline in RRF) (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85 - 0.96) were independent factors for less mortality risk in patients with DCS = 0. However, only a higher slope of RRFD (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94 - 0.99) was significant for better survival in CAPD patients with DCS > 0.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the baseline RRF, CAPD patients with co-morbidities that rapidly deteriorate RRFD are more crucially associated with long-term mortality risk.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPD; anuria; co-morbidity; diabetes mellitus; residual renal function; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711636      PMCID: PMC4406312          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  27 in total

1.  Predictors of faster decline of residual renal function in Taiwanese peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Chia-Te Liao; Chih-Chung Shiao; Jenq-Wen Huang; Kuan-Yu Hung; Hsueh-Fang Chuang; Yung-Ming Chen; Kwan-Dun Wu; Tun-Jun Tsai
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Comorbidity, urea kinetics, and appetite in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: their interrelationship and prediction of survival.

Authors:  S J Davies; L Russell; J Bryan; L Phillips; G I Russell
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Biocompatible membranes preserve residual renal function in patients undergoing regular hemodialysis.

Authors:  J Hartmann; H Fricke; H Schiffl
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function.

Authors:  M K Menon; D M Naimark; J M Bargman; S I Vas; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Rate of decline of residual renal function in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis and factors affecting it.

Authors:  M K Singhal; S Bhaskaran; E Vidgen; J M Bargman; S I Vas; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Definition and risk factors of rapidly declining residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: an observational study.

Authors:  Stefan Herget-Rosenthal; Michael von Ostrowski; Andreas Kribben
Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.687

7.  The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD )-2.

Authors:  Fabian Termorshuizen; Johanna C Korevaar; Friedo W Dekker; Jeannette G van Manen; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Rate of decline of residual renal function is associated with all-cause mortality and technique failure in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Chia-Te Liao; Yung-Ming Chen; Chih-Chung Shiao; Fu-Chang Hu; Jenq-Wen Huang; Tze-Wah Kao; Hsueh-Fang Chuang; Kuan-Yu Hung; Kwan-Dun Wu; Tun-Jun Tsai
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, valsartan, on residual renal function in patients on CAPD.

Authors:  Hiromichi Suzuki; Yoshihiko Kanno; Soichi Sugahara; Hirokazu Okada; Hidetomo Nakamoto
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  Cardiorenal syndrome.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; Mikko Haapio; Andrew A House; Nagesh Anavekar; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

1.  Residual Kidney Function Decline and Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Obi; Connie M Rhee; Anna T Mathew; Gaurang Shah; Elani Streja; Steven M Brunelli; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rajnish Mehrotra; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Seok Hui Kang; Eun Woo Choi; Jong Won Park; Kyu Hyang Cho; Jun Young Do
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Very early withdrawal from treatment in patients starting peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Qimei Luo; Xi Xia; Zhenchuan Lin; Jianxiong Lin; Xiao Yang; Fengxian Huang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.