Literature DB >> 24711584

Using item and test information to optimize targeted assessments of psychological distress.

Jan R Böhnke1, Wolfgang Lutz2.   

Abstract

The need for efficient clinical assessment instruments has been growing during the past years. In the current application, the item information (item response theory) is used to evaluate and build fixed short versions. The method was applied to a questionnaire measuring psychological distress and data were collected from two mixed outpatient and general population samples. After fitting the partial credit model, two short versions were built: one to increase efficiency in screening applications; the other for the monitoring of high distress patients. A cross-validation bootstrap procedure is proposed to check whether the short versions are more efficient than alternative item selections. Using the partial credit model, the results from short and full versions can be compared on score level, which improves the flexibility of the assessment. The discussion focuses on the model selection and on how many items are realistically needed in routine assessments of psychological distress.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  item information; item response theory; patient reported outcome; patient-focused research; research-practitioner network; short forms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711584     DOI: 10.1177/1073191114529152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  7 in total

1.  Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany.

Authors:  Felix Fischer; Chris Gibbons; Joël Coste; Jose M Valderas; Matthias Rose; Alain Leplège
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Computerized adaptive testing of population psychological distress: simulation-based evaluation of GHQ-30.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Jan R Böhnke; Kate E Pickett; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  A systematic review of alcohol screening and assessment measures for young people: a study protocol.

Authors:  Paul Toner; Jan R Böhnke; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Factors of psychological distress: clinical value, measurement substance, and methodological artefacts.

Authors:  J R Böhnke; T J Croudace
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Validity of single item responses to short message service texts to monitor depression: an mHealth sub-study of the UK ACUDep trial.

Authors:  Ada Keding; Jan R Böhnke; Tim J Croudace; Stewart J Richmond; Hugh MacPherson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing for general psychological distress: combining GHQ-12 and Affectometer-2 in an item bank for public mental health research.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Jan R Böhnke; Kate E Pickett; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Calibrating well-being, quality of life and common mental disorder items: psychometric epidemiology in public mental health research.

Authors:  Jan R Böhnke; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 9.319

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.