Literature DB >> 24711427

Degenerate target sites mediate rapid primed CRISPR adaptation.

Peter C Fineran1, Matthias J H Gerritzen, María Suárez-Diez, Tim Künne, Jos Boekhorst, Sacha A F T van Hijum, Raymond H J Staals, Stan J J Brouns.   

Abstract

Prokaryotes encode adaptive immune systems, called CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated), to provide resistance against mobile invaders, such as viruses and plasmids. Host immunity is based on incorporation of invader DNA sequences in a memory locus (CRISPR), the formation of guide RNAs from this locus, and the degradation of cognate invader DNA (protospacer). Invaders can escape type I-E CRISPR-Cas immunity in Escherichia coli K12 by making point mutations in the seed region of the protospacer or its adjacent motif (PAM), but hosts quickly restore immunity by integrating new spacers in a positive-feedback process termed "priming." Here, by using a randomized protospacer and PAM library and high-throughput plasmid loss assays, we provide a systematic analysis of the constraints of both direct interference and subsequent priming in E. coli. We have defined a high-resolution genetic map of direct interference by Cascade and Cas3, which includes five positions of the protospacer at 6-nt intervals that readily tolerate mutations. Importantly, we show that priming is an extremely robust process capable of using degenerate target regions, with up to 13 mutations throughout the PAM and protospacer region. Priming is influenced by the number of mismatches, their position, and is nucleotide dependent. Our findings imply that even outdated spacers containing many mismatches can induce a rapid primed CRISPR response against diversified or related invaders, giving microbes an advantage in the coevolutionary arms race with their invaders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive immunity; crRNA; horizontal gene transfer; next-generation sequencing; phage resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711427      PMCID: PMC4000823          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400071111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  DNA motifs determining the efficiency of adaptation into the Escherichia coli CRISPR array.

Authors:  Ido Yosef; Dror Shitrit; Moran G Goren; David Burstein; Tal Pupko; Udi Qimron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences.

Authors:  Julie E Samson; Alfonso H Magadán; Mourad Sabri; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 3.  Planting the seed: target recognition of short guide RNAs.

Authors:  Tim Künne; Daan C Swarts; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  High-throughput analysis of type I-E CRISPR/Cas spacer acquisition in E. coli.

Authors:  Ekaterina Savitskaya; Ekaterina Semenova; Vladimir Dedkov; Anastasia Metlitskaya; Konstantin Severinov
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting Type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Raymond H J Staals; Yoshihiro Agari; Saori Maki-Yonekura; Yifan Zhu; David W Taylor; Esther van Duijn; Arjan Barendregt; Marnix Vlot; Jasper J Koehorst; Keiko Sakamoto; Akiko Masuda; Naoshi Dohmae; Peter J Schaap; Jennifer A Doudna; Albert J R Heck; Koji Yonekura; John van der Oost; Akeo Shinkai
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing.

Authors:  Kevin M Esvelt; Prashant Mali; Jonathan L Braff; Mark Moosburner; Stephanie J Yaung; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Type I-E CRISPR-cas systems discriminate target from non-target DNA through base pairing-independent PAM recognition.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Ekaterina Semenova; Kirill A Datsenko; Ryan N Jackson; Blake Wiedenheft; Konstantin Severinov; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity.

Authors:  Shiraz A Shah; Susanne Erdmann; Francisco J M Mojica; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  CRISPR-spacer integration reporter plasmids reveal distinct genuine acquisition specificities among CRISPR-Cas I-E variants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  César Díez-Villaseñor; Noemí M Guzmán; Cristóbal Almendros; Jesús García-Martínez; Francisco J M Mojica
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Unexpectedly broad target recognition of the CRISPR-mediated virus defence system in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus.

Authors:  Andrea Manica; Ziga Zebec; Julia Steinkellner; Christa Schleper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  115 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR-Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action.

Authors:  Gil Amitai; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Cas4 Nucleases Can Effect Specific Integration of CRISPR Spacers.

Authors:  Zhufeng Zhang; Saifu Pan; Tao Liu; Yingjun Li; Nan Peng
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Mechanism of foreign DNA recognition by a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  MaryClare F Rollins; Jason T Schuman; Kirra Paulus; Habib S T Bukhari; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Rapid and Scalable Characterization of CRISPR Technologies Using an E. coli Cell-Free Transcription-Translation System.

Authors:  Ryan Marshall; Colin S Maxwell; Scott P Collins; Thomas Jacobsen; Michelle L Luo; Matthew B Begemann; Benjamin N Gray; Emma January; Anna Singer; Yonghua He; Chase L Beisel; Vincent Noireaux
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Different genetic and morphological outcomes for phages targeted by single or multiple CRISPR-Cas spacers.

Authors:  B N J Watson; R A Easingwood; B Tong; M Wolf; G P C Salmond; R H J Staals; M Bostina; P C Fineran
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Cas1 and the Csy complex are opposing regulators of Cas2/3 nuclease activity.

Authors:  MaryClare F Rollins; Saikat Chowdhury; Joshua Carter; Sarah M Golden; Royce A Wilkinson; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Gabriel C Lander; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure Basis for Directional R-loop Formation and Substrate Handover Mechanisms in Type I CRISPR-Cas System.

Authors:  Yibei Xiao; Min Luo; Robert P Hayes; Jonathan Kim; Sherwin Ng; Fang Ding; Maofu Liao; Ailong Ke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  High-Throughput Characterization of Cascade type I-E CRISPR Guide Efficacy Reveals Unexpected PAM Diversity and Target Sequence Preferences.

Authors:  Becky Xu Hua Fu; Michael Wainberg; Anshul Kundaje; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-F CRISPR-Cas Adaptation Determined Using a Biofilm Enrichment Assay.

Authors:  Gary E Heussler; Jon L Miller; Courtney E Price; Alan J Collins; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Adapting to new threats: the generation of memory by CRISPR-Cas immune systems.

Authors:  Robert Heler; Luciano A Marraffini; David Bikard
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.