Literature DB >> 24711255

Bone marrow 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography cannot replace bone marrow biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Hugo J A Adams1, Thomas C Kwee, Rob Fijnheer, Stefan V Dubois, Rutger A J Nievelstein, John M H de Klerk.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether visual and quantitative (18) F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)-based bone marrow assessment can replace blind bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective study included 78 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who had undergone both FDG-PET/CT and BMB. FDG-PET/CT images were visually evaluated for bone marrow involvement. Patient-based sensitivity of visual FDG-PET/CT assessment was calculated using BMB as the reference standard. Metabolically active volume, maximum standardized uptake value, 3D partial volume corrected mean standardized uptake value, and 3D partial volume corrected mean metabolic volume product (cMVPmean ) of FDG-avid bone marrow lesions were measured. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the influence of (potential) prognostic factors (BMB status, visual [dichotomous] FDG-PET/CT bone marrow status, metabolically active volume, maximum standardized uptake value, 3D partial volume corrected mean standardized uptake value, 3D partial volume corrected mean metabolic volume product, and International Prognostic Index score) on progression-free survival and overall survival. FDG-PET/CT detected bone marrow involvement in 34 (43.6%) cases and BMB in 16 (20.5%) of 78 cases, of whom 11 were also detected by FDG-PET/CT, resulting in a patient-based sensitivity of 68.8% (95% confidence interval = 44.2%-86.1%) for FDG-PET/CT. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, only BMB status was an independent predictive factor of progression-free survival (P = 0.016) and overall survival (P = 0.004). In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT misses bone marrow involvement that has been detected by BMB in a non-negligible proportion of patients. Furthermore, both visual and quantitative FDG-PET/CT-based bone marrow assessments are prognostically inferior to BMB. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT cannot replace BMB in newly diagnosed DLBCL.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711255     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients.

Authors:  Yusuke Kanemasa; Tatsu Shimoyama; Yuki Sasaki; Miho Tamura; Takeshi Sawada; Yasushi Omuro; Tsunekazu Hishima; Yoshiharu Maeda
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Baseline FDG-PET/CT detects bone marrow involvement in follicular lymphoma and provides relevant prognostic information.

Authors:  Reiko Nakajima; Alison J Moskowitz; Laure Michaud; Audrey Mauguen; Connie Lee Batlevi; Ahmet Dogan; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-04-28

3.  PET/CT predicts bone marrow involvement in paediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma and may preclude the need for bone marrow biopsy in selected patients.

Authors:  Suyun Chen; Shaoyan Wang; Kejun He; Chao Ma; Hongliang Fu; Hui Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of Bone Marrow Involvement with Bone Marrow Biopsy and PET-CT and Evaluation of Any Effects on Survival in Patients Diagnosed with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Mesut Göçer; Erdal Kurtoğlu
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Does the presence of tumor-induced cortical bone destruction at CT have any prognostic value in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; John M H de Klerk; Rob Fijnheer; Ben G F Heggelman; Stefan V Dubois; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  The use of FDG-PET in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL): predicting outcome following first line therapy.

Authors:  Monica Coughlan; Rebecca Elstrom
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  The prognostic significance of monoclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in conjunction with histologic B-cell aggregates in the bone marrow of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Cho; Woo Ick Yang; Jae-Woo Song; Yoo Hong Min; Sun Och Yoon
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 8.  Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Precision Oncology: How Imaging Is Helpful.

Authors:  Hina J Shah; Abhishek R Keraliya; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Vikram R Lele; Pamela J DiPiro
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow F-18 FDG Uptake in Patients with Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Jiyoung Wang; Dongwoo Kim; Won Jun Kang; Hojin Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-13

10.  Bone marrow biopsy superiority over PET/CT in predicting progression-free survival in a homogeneously-treated cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Tzu-Hua Chen-Liang; Taida Martín-Santos; Andrés Jerez; Guillermo Rodríguez-García; Leonor Senent; Cristina Martínez-Millán; Begoña Muiña; Mayte Orero; Anabel Teruel; Alejandro Martín; Joaquín Gómez-Espuch; Kyra Kennedy; Carmen Benet; José María Raya; Marta Fernández-González; Fátima de la Cruz; Marta Guinot; Carolina Villegas; Isabel Ballester; Mónica Baile; María Moya; Javier López-Jiménez; Laura Frutos; José Luis Navarro; Jon Uña; Rosa Fernández-López; Carolina Igua; José Contreras; Raquel Sánchez-Vañó; María Del Puig Cozar; Pilar Tamayo; Jorge Mucientes; José Javier Sánchez-Blanco; Elena Pérez-Ceballos; Francisco José Ortuño
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.