Literature DB >> 24711165

A comparison study on the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Meng Li1, Sheung-wai Law2, Jack Cheng2, Ho-man Kee3, Man Sang Wong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is one of the major health problems in aging population and may lead to osteoporotic vertebral fracture that causes severe back pain and reduced functional independency.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis at the subacute stage (the second and third weeks of disease onset) of the patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial, pilot trial.
METHODS: A total of 51 female subjects aged 55 years or above with osteoporotic vertebral fracture were randomly distributed to the soft lumbar orthosis (control group, n = 24) and SpinoMed® (test group, n = 27) groups after the acute stage (the first week of disease onset). The pain level was assessed by obtaining verbally feedback in 10-point scale scoring, while functional mobility level was estimated with Functional Independence Measure-motor Scores, Elderly Mobility Scale, and Modified Functional Ambulation Category. The thoracic kyphosis angle was measured from standing X-ray on 10 out of 51 subjects. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Both groups showed significant reduction in the patients' pain level and limitations of daily life (p < 0.05). The effect of the two types of spinal orthoses on the pain level reduction and functional mobility level gain did not show significant difference (p > 0.05) at the subacute stage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this study, SpinoMed® could not provide additional treatment benefits to patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture regarding pain relief and functional independence improvement at the subacute stage. The effects of SpinoMed® in muscle-strengthening and thoracic kyphotic angle reduction for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture need to be further verified in a more intensive and longer-term training program. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporotic vertebral fracture; SpinoMed®; soft lumbar orthosis; thoracolumbosacral orthosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711165     DOI: 10.1177/0309364614528204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Rzewuska; Manuela Ferreira; Andrew J McLachlan; Gustavo C Machado; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Spinal orthoses in the treatment of vertebral fractures with osteoporosis : A systematic review article].

Authors:  M Pfeifer; M Gehlen; C Hinz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Effect of Brace to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Zhe Jin; Jae Hyup Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Rigid and Soft-Brace Treatments for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kato; Hiroyuki Inose; Shoichi Ichimura; Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroaki Nakamura; Masatoshi Hoshino; Daisuke Togawa; Toru Hirano; Hirotaka Haro; Tetsuro Ohba; Takashi Tsuji; Kimiaki Sato; Yutaka Sasao; Masahiko Takahata; Koji Otani; Suketaka Momoshima; Ukihide Tateishi; Makoto Tomita; Ryuichi Takemasa; Masato Yuasa; Takashi Hirai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Osteoporotic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebrae: Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; Hartmut Bork; Sebastian Grüninger; Uwe Maus; Georg Osterhoff; Max J Scheyerer; Philipp Pieroh; Jörg Schnoor; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Orthotics and taping in the management of vertebral fractures in people with osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria A Goodwin; Abigail J Hall; Emily Rogers; Alison Bethel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effects of mind-body exercises for osteoporosis in older adults: Protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yonghui Zhang; Zhijie Wang; Min Lu; Qichao Wang; Haijiao Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Feasibility of simple exercise interventions for men with osteoporosis - A prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Franca Genest; Sarah Lindström; Sophia Scherer; Michael Schneider; Lothar Seefried
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  The Role of Spinal Orthoses in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of the Elderly Population (Age 60 Years or Older): Systematic Review.

Authors:  Barry Ting Sheen Kweh; Hui Qing Lee; Terence Tan; Joost Rutges; Travis Marion; Kim Siong Tew; Vikram Bhalla; Shyaman Menon; Fetullah Cumhur Oner; Charles Fisher; Jin Wee Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.