Literature DB >> 24710683

Thinking beyond surgery in the management of renal cell carcinoma: the risk to die from renal cell carcinoma and competing risks of death.

David Y T Chen1, Robert G Uzzo, Rosalia Viterbo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The presentation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed where it is most commonly identified when asymptomatic and incidental. Contemporary patients with renal tumors are often older in age and may have significant concurrent medical comorbidity, where proceeding with routine surgical treatment may not be of benefit. Traditional clinical assessments have not considered the impact of comorbidity on oncologic outcome, and recent studies have demonstrated the relationship between comorbidity and patient survival. We review the existing data examining the significance of medical comorbidity on RCC management and outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The existing literature on this topic is reviewed, and validated measures of comorbidity are described. The available studies examining the relationship between comorbidity and RCC are summarized. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The article reviews the growing body of literature supporting the importance of assessment of patient comorbidity, and we highlight novel prognostic instruments that can estimate the likelihood of several different patient outcomes following RCC treatment, and these nomograms can be accessed via a web-based portal ( www.cancernomograms.com ) to assist in patient education and clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710683     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1285-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

1.  Incidental renal tumors: casting doubt on the efficacy of early intervention.

Authors:  J K Parsons; M S Schoenberg; H B Carter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Active surveillance: a potential strategy for select patients with small renal masses.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  The prognostic impact of comorbidities on renal cancer, 1995 to 2006: a Danish population based study.

Authors:  Lars Lund; Jacob Jacobsen; Mette Nørgaard; Joseph K McLaughlin; William J Blot; Michael Borre; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Clinical assessments as predictors of one year survival after hospitalization: implications for prognostic stratification.

Authors:  P Pompei; M E Charlson; R G Douglas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Risk adjustment in outcome assessment: the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  W D'Hoore; C Sicotte; C Tilquin
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Five-year survival after surgical treatment for kidney cancer: a population-based competing risk analysis.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Can we avoid surgery in elderly patients with renal masses by using the Charlson comorbidity index?

Authors:  Kevin M O'Connor; Niall Davis; Gerry M Lennon; David M Quinlan; David W Mulvin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Survival analysis of clear cell renal carcinoma according to the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Daniel Santos Arrontes; María Jesús Fernández Aceñero; Jesús Isidoro García González; Manuel Martín Muñoz; Pedro Paniagua Andrés
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses: A Review of the Aims and Preliminary Results of the DISSRM Registry.

Authors:  Matthew R Danzig; Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; Mohamad E Allaf; James M McKiernan; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Comparison of the prognostic value of pretreatment measurements of systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing curative resection of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ilaria Lucca; Michela de Martino; Sebastian L Hofbauer; Nura Zamani; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Renal cell carcinoma recurrences and metastases in primary non-metastatic patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Saeed Dabestani; Andreas Thorstenson; Per Lindblad; Ulrika Harmenberg; Börje Ljungberg; Sven Lundstam
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Hu; Yan Wang; Wei-Xiao Yang; Wei-Chao Dou; Yan-Xiang Shao; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  The correlation between gain of chromosome 8q and survival in patients with clear and papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Reza Mehrazin; Essel Dulaimi; Robert G Uzzo; Karthik Devarjan; Jianming Pei; Marc C Smaldone; Alexander Kutikov; Joseph R Testa; Tahseen Al-Saleem
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.